...
首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrics and Gynecology: Journal of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists >Complications and Continuation of Intrauterine Device Use Among Commercially Insured Teenagers
【24h】

Complications and Continuation of Intrauterine Device Use Among Commercially Insured Teenagers

机译:商业投保青少年宫内节育器的并发症和持续使用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Many U.S. health care providers remain reluctant to prescribe intrauterine devices (ILJDs) to teenagers as a result of concerns about serious complications. This study examined whether 15-19-year-old IUD users were more likely to experience complications, failure, or early discontinuation than adult users aged 20-24 years and 25-44 years and whether there were differences in these outcomes between users of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems and copper ILJDs.METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using health insurance claims obtained from a private insurance company of 90,489 women who had an IUD inserted between 2002 and 2009. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds of experiencing complications, method failure, or early discontinuation within 12 months of insertion by age group and type of IUD inserted.RESULTS: Serious complications, including ectopic pregnancy and pelvic inflammatory disease, occurred in less than 1% of patients regardless of age or IUD type. Women aged 15-19 years were more likely than those aged 25-44 years to have a claim for dysmenorrhea (odds ratio [OR] 1.4, confidence interval [Cl] 1.1-1.6), amenor-rhea (OR 1.3, Cl 1.1-1.5), or normal pregnancy (OR 1.4, Cl 1.1-1.8). Overall, early discontinuation did not differ between teenagers and women aged 25-44 years (13% compared with 11%, P>.05). However, use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system was associated with fewer complications and less early discontinuation than the copper IUD in all age groups.CONCLUSIONS: The IUD is as appropriate for teenagers to use as it is for older women, with serious complications occurring infrequently in all groups. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system may be a better choice than the copper IUD as a result of lower odds of complications, discontinuation, and failure
机译:目的:由于担心严重的并发症,许多美国医疗保健提供者仍然不愿意向青少年开具子宫内避孕器(ILJD)。这项研究调查了15-19岁的宫内节育器使用者是否比20-24岁和25-44岁的成年使用者更容易出现并发症,失败或早期停药,左炔诺孕酮使用者之间这些结果是否存在差异方法:回顾性队列研究是使用从90,489名在2002年至2009年间插入宫内节育器的妇女的私人保险公司获得的健康保险索赔进行的一项回顾性队列研究。采用Logistic回归模型来估计发生这种情况的几率结果:年龄,宫内节育器类型不同,只有不到1%的患者发生严重并发症,包括异位妊娠和盆腔炎,其中包括异位妊娠和盆腔炎。 15-19岁的女性比25-44岁的女性更容易发生痛经(奇数比[OR] 1.4,置信区间[Cl] 1.1-1.6),闭经性变(OR 1.3,Cl 1.1- 1.5)或正常怀孕(OR 1.4,Cl 1.1-1.8)。总体而言,青少年和年龄在25-44岁之间的女性之间的早期停药没有差异(13%比11%,P> 0.05)。然而,与所有年龄段的铜制宫内节育器相比,使用左炔诺孕酮释放宫内节育器的并发症更少,早期停药更少。结论:宫内节育器适合青少年使用,适合年长妇女使用,发生严重并发症在所有小组中很少。左炔诺孕酮释放宫腔系统可能比铜制宫内节育器更好,因为并发症,停药和失败的几率较低

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号