...
首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrical and gynecological survey >Ulipristal acetate versus leuprolide acetate for uterine fibroids
【24h】

Ulipristal acetate versus leuprolide acetate for uterine fibroids

机译:醋酸Uristristal与醋酸亮丙瑞林治疗子宫肌瘤

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

ABSTRACT Current intervention strategies for management of uterine fibroids in women of reproductive age are primarily surgical or radiological. There are limited options for medical therapy. Two small placebo-controlled trials showed that ulipristal acetate, a selective progesterone-receptor modulator (SPRM), reduced fibroid and uterine sizes in women with symptomatic fibroids. The aim of this randomized, double-blind, controlled noninferiority trial was to determine whether ulipristal acetate was noninferior to leuprolide acetate in controlling bleeding before planned surgery in premenopausal women with symptomatic fibroids. Another aim was to compare the adverse effect profile of the 2 drugs. The participants, 307 patients with heavy uterine bleeding, were randomized to receive 3 months of daily therapy with oral ulipristal acetate (either 5 or 10 mg) or once-monthly intramuscular injections of leuprolide acetate (3.75 mg). The primary study outcome was the proportion of patients with controlled uterine bleeding at week 13. A prespecified noninferiority margin of -20% was used. Bleeding was controlled at 13 weeks in all 3 treatment groups; there was 90% control with the 5-mg dose of ulipristal acetate: 98% with the 10-mg dose versus 89% with the leuprolide acetate injection; the difference between ulipristal acetate and leuprolide acetate was 1.2 percentage points (95% confidence interval, -9.3 to 11.8) for the 5-mg dose and 8.8 percentage points (95% confidence interval, 0.4 to 18.3) for the 10-mg dose. Bleeding was attenuated more rapidly with ulipristal acetate than leuprolide acetate: median times to amenorrhea were 7 days in patients receiving 5 mg of ulipristal acetate and 5 days in those receiving 10 mg versus 21 days in those receiving leuprolide acetate. Moderate-to-severe hot flashes occurred less frequently in patients treated with ulipristal acetate than in those treated with leuprolide acetate: 11% with the 5-mg dose of ulipristal acetate and 10% with the 10-mg dose compared with 40% in those treated with leuprolide acetate (P < 0.001 for both comparisons). These findings show that daily doses of oral ulipristal acetate of both 5 and 10 mg were noninferior to once-monthly injections of leuprolide acetate in controlling bleeding in patients with fibroids and were less likely to cause hot flashes.
机译:摘要当前用于治疗育龄妇女子宫肌瘤的干预策略主要是手术或放射学。药物治疗的选择有限。两项小型的安慰剂对照试验表明,有症状的肌瘤妇女醋酸乌利司他,一种选择性的孕激素受体调节剂(SPRM),可减少肌瘤和子宫的大小。这项随机,双盲,对照,非劣效性临床试验的目的是确定在计划内有症状的肌瘤女性手术前,醋酸乌利司他在控制出血方面是否不劣于醋酸亮丙瑞林。另一个目的是比较两种药物的不良反应。 307名患有严重子宫出血的患者被随机分配接受口服醋酸乌利司他酯(5或10 mg)或每月一次肌肉注射醋酸亮丙瑞林(3.75 mg)的3个月每日治疗。主要研究结果是在第13周时子宫出血得到控制的患者比例。使用预先指定的-20%的非劣效性余量。所有3个治疗组的出血均控制在13周。 5 mg剂量的乙酸乌利司他有90%的对照:10 mg剂量的有98%,而乙酸亮丙瑞林注射的有89%。对于5毫克剂量,醋酸乌利司他与醋酸亮丙瑞林之间的差异为1.2个百分点(95%置信区间为-9.3至11.8),对于10毫克剂量而言为8.8个百分点(95%置信区间为0.4至18.3)。醋酸乌利司特比醋酸亮丙瑞林更能减少出血:接受醋酸乌利司特5 mg的患者中位闭经时间为7天,而接受醋酸亮丙瑞德的患者中位闭经时间为5天,而接受醋酸亮丙瑞德的患者为21天。醋酸乌利司他治疗的患者出现中度至重度潮热的频率低于醋酸亮丙瑞林治疗的患者:醋酸乌利司他5 mg剂量的患者为11%,10毫克剂量为10%,而醋酸亮丙瑞德的患者为40%用醋酸亮丙瑞林治疗(两个比较均P <0.001)。这些发现表明,在控制肌瘤患者出血方面,口服醋酸乌利司他每日剂量为5毫克和10毫克均不次于每月一次注射醋酸亮丙瑞林,且不太可能引起潮热。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号