首页> 外文期刊>Rural Sociology >A Study of Individual-Level Social Capital and Health Outcomes: Testing for Variance between Rural and Urban Respondents
【24h】

A Study of Individual-Level Social Capital and Health Outcomes: Testing for Variance between Rural and Urban Respondents

机译:个人层面的社会资本与健康成果研究:城乡受访者差异的检验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study examines associations between social capital and health outcomes with data from the 2010 Brazos Valley Health Survey (Texas) (N = 3,176). Multivariate adjusted logistic regression analysis demonstrated that poor and fair health status was inversely predicted by both high trust (adjusted OR = .67 [CI = .50-.92]) and high informal social ties (adjusted OR = .68 [CI = .49-.94]), as well as being predicted by the interaction of urban-rural and community participation (adjusted OR = 1.20 [CI = 1.02-1.40]). Mental distress was inversely predicted by high trust (adjusted OR = .51 [CI = .29-.89]) and the interaction of urban/rural and informal social ties (adjusted OR = .77 [CI = .61-.97]). Thus, whereas social capital poses general benefits in regard to improving health status and mental distress, the former benefits are greater for rural respondents, while the latter benefits are greater for urban respondents.
机译:这项研究使用2010年Brazos谷健康调查(Texas)的数据(N = 3,176)研究了社会资本与健康结果之间的关联。多变量调整逻辑回归分析表明,高信任度(调整后的OR = .67 [CI = .50-.92])和较高的非正式社会关系(调整后的OR = .68 [CI =。 49-.94]),以及通过城乡与社区参与的相互作用进行预测(调整后的OR = 1.20 [CI = 1.02-1.40])。高信任度(调整后的OR = .51 [CI = .29-.89])以及城市/农村和非正式社会纽带的相互作用(调整后的OR = .77 [CI = .61-.97])反演了心理困扰。 )。因此,尽管社会资本在改善健康状况和精神困扰方面具有普遍利益,但前者对农村受访者的好处更大,而后者对城市受访者的好处更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号