首页> 外文期刊>Russian Entomological Journal >A comparison of a new centrifuge sugar flotation technique with the agar method for the extraction of immature Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) life stages from salt marsh soils1
【24h】

A comparison of a new centrifuge sugar flotation technique with the agar method for the extraction of immature Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) life stages from salt marsh soils1

机译:一种新的离心糖浮选技术与琼脂法从盐沼土壤中提取未成熟Culicoides(Diptera:Ceratopogonidae)生命阶段的比较1

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Two sampling techniques, agar extraction (AE) and centrifuge sugar flotation extraction (CSFE), were compared to determine their relative efficacy to recover immature stages of Culicoides from salt marsh substrates. Three types of samples (seeded withknown numbers of larvae, homogenized field samples with approximately equal numbers of imma-tures, and regular field samples with an unknown number of immatures) were evaluated. Two substrate sample sizes were used (100 ml and 1000 ml). Agar extractionwas used with both sample sizes, but CSFE was only used with the 100 ml size. The seeded samples were inoculated with 3rd-4th instar larvae at 5 levels (0, 25, 50, 100 and 200 larvae / sample). Mean percent recovery was similar at all inoculation rates within each extraction technique, but the CSFE recovered 95.7% compared to 35.3% for AE1000 and 16.7% for AE100. For the homogenized samples, on a per sample basis, the AE1000 method recovered about twice more immatures than the CSFE, but on a mean numberof immatures recovered per ml basis, CSFE recovered 5.2 times more than AE1000. Similarly, for the regular field samples, on a per sample basis the AE1000 method recovered ca. 1.5 times more immature stages than samples processed by CSFE, but on the immatures per ml of substrate basis the CSFE method recovered ca. 6.6 times more than AE1000. Overall, on a per ml basis the AE100 and AE1000 recovered an approximately equal number of immatures. The CSFE technique proved to be advantageous because greaternumbers of immatures were collected with less substrate. As a result, this technique allowed more samples to be taken over a larger area with less effort. Also larvae were recovered from the samples in hours instead of days. Thus, more information on thespatial dynamics of Culicoides immature populations may be obtained in less time using the CSFE technique. A major disadvantage of this method is that a fairly expensive centrifuge is required for processing samples.
机译:比较了两种采样技术,琼脂提取(AE)和离心糖浮选提取(CSFE),以确定它们从盐沼基质中回收未成熟阶段库里科德的相对效力。评估了三种类型的样品(接种了已知数量的幼虫,均质的未成熟的均质田间样品和未知数量的未成熟的常规田间样品)。使用两种底物样品大小(100 ml和1000 ml)。两种样品均使用琼脂提取,但CSFE仅用于100 ml样品。接种的样品分别以5个水平(0、25、50、100和200个幼虫/样品)接种3至4龄幼虫。在每种提取技术下,所有接种率下的平均回收率均相似,但CSFE回收率达95.7%,而AE1000为35.3%,AE100为16.7%。对于均质的样品,按每个样品计算,AE1000方法回收的未成熟物大约是CSFE的两倍,但按每毫升回收的平均未成熟物数计算,CSFE的回收率是AE1000的5.2倍。类似地,对于常规田间样品,AE1000方法在每个样品的基础上回收了约5%。未成熟阶段的数量是CSFE处理的样品的1.5倍,但基于每毫升底物的未成熟数量,CSFE方法的回收率约为5%。是AE1000的6.6倍。总体而言,以每毫升为基础,AE100和AE1000回收了大约相等数量的未成熟物。 CSFE技术被证明是有利的,因为可以收集较少数量的底物,从而收集到更多的未成熟物。结果,该技术允许以较小的努力在较大的区域上采集更多的样本。数小时而不是数天即可从样品中回收幼虫。因此,使用CSFE技术可以在更短的时间内获得有关库柏未成熟种群空间动态的更多信息。该方法的主要缺点是处理样品需要相当昂贵的离心机。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号