...
首页> 外文期刊>Rheumatology >Efficacy and safety of leflunomide 10 mg versus 20 mg once daily in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: multinational double-blind, randomized trial.
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of leflunomide 10 mg versus 20 mg once daily in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: multinational double-blind, randomized trial.

机译:活动性类风湿性关节炎患者中来氟米特10 mg和每日20 mg来氟米特的疗效和安全性:跨国双盲,随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety profile of two daily maintenance doses of leflunomide, 10 mg and 20 mg, for the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In this multinational, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, 402 RA patients were randomized equally to receive daily doses of 10 mg leflunomide (n = 202; loading dose on day 3, 100 mg) or 20 mg leflunomide (n = 200; loading dose on day 1-3, 100 mg) for 24 weeks. The study was designed to demonstrate non-inferiority of the efficacy of 10 mg compared with 20 mg by calculating 95% confidence intervals for differences in changes in tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC) and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI), comparing these confidence intervals with predefined bounds. RESULTS: In the intent-to-treat population, mean improvements at the end-point in the 10 and 20 mg groups respectively were: TJC, -7.57 and -8.89 (P = 0.061); SJC, -6.38 and -6.96 (P = 0.304); and HAQ DI, 0-0.37 and 0-0.49 (P = 0.095). By American College of Rheumatology (ACR) > or =20% criteria, response rates were 49.8 and 56.6% respectively (P = 0.1724). Adverse events (AEs) resulting in treatment withdrawal were higher in the 10 mg (15.3%) than in the 20 mg treatment group (12.0%), as were serious adverse events (SAEs): 12.9 vs 10.0%. CONCLUSIONS: This study rejected the hypothesis of non-inferiority of 10 mg compared with 20 mg daily maintenance doses of leflunomide. More AEs resulting in treatment discontinuation and SAEs in patients receiving 10 mg leflunomide daily also support a better efficacy profile for the 20 mg daily dose.
机译:目的:比较每日两次维持剂量的来氟米特(10毫克和20毫克)治疗活动性类风湿关节炎(RA)的疗效和安全性。方法:在这项多国,随机,双盲,平行组研究中,将402名RA患者平均随机分配为接受10 mg来氟米特的每日剂量(n = 202;第3天的负荷剂量100 mg)或20 mg来氟米特( n = 200;第1-3天的剂量(100毫克)持续24周。该研究旨在通过计算95%的置信区间来确定10 mg与20 mg的疗效之间的劣势,该置信区间是针对嫩关节计数(TJC),肿胀关节计数(SJC)和健康评估问卷残疾指数( HAQ DI),将这些置信区间与预定义范围进行比较。结果:在意向性治疗人群中,在10 mg和20 mg组的终点平均改善分别为:TJC,-7.57和-8.89(P = 0.061); SJC,-6.38和-6.96(P = 0.304); HAQ DI,0-0.37和0-0.49(P = 0.095)。根据美国风湿病学会(ACR)>或= 20%的标准,缓解率分别为49.8和56.6%(P = 0.1724)。导致停药的不良事件(AEs)在10 mg(15.3%)中高于在20 mg治疗组(12.0%),严重不良事件(SAEs)也分别为12.9和10.0%。结论:这项研究否认了10 mg非劣效性与20 mg每日维持剂量来氟米特相比的假设。每天接受10 mg来氟米特的患者出现更多的AE,导致治疗中断和SAE,这也支持每天20 mg剂量的更好疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号