首页> 外文期刊>Rheumatology >Effectiveness of community- and workplace-based interventions to manage musculoskeletal-related sickness absence and job loss: A systematic review
【24h】

Effectiveness of community- and workplace-based interventions to manage musculoskeletal-related sickness absence and job loss: A systematic review

机译:基于社区和工作场所的干预措施对管理与肌肉骨骼有关的疾病缺勤和失业的有效性:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective. To assess the effectiveness of interventions in community and workplace settings to reduce sickness absence and job loss in workers with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). Methods. Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies, published since 1990, were identified by screening citations from 35 earlier systematic reviews and by searching MEDLINE and Embase until April 2010. Effects were estimated by intervention category and other features, including study quality. Results. Among 42 studies (including 34 RCTs), 27 assessed return to work (RTW), 21 duration of sickness absence and 5 job loss. Interventions included exercise therapy, behavioural change techniques, workplace adaptations and provision of additional services. Studies were typically small {median sample 107 [inter-quartile range (IQR) 77-148]} and limited in quality. Most interventions appeared beneficial: the median relative risk (RR) for RTW was 1.21 (IQR 1.00-1.60) and that for avoiding MSD-related job loss was 1.25 (IQR 1.06-1.71); the median reduction in sickness absence was 1.11 (IQR 0.32-3.20) days/month. However, effects were smaller in larger and better-quality studies, suggesting publication bias. No intervention was clearly superior, although effort-intensive interventions were less effective than simple ones. No cost-benefit analyses established statistically significant net economic benefits. Conclusion. As benefits are small and of doubtful cost-effectiveness, employers' practice should be guided by their value judgements about the uncertainties. Expensive interventions should be implemented only with rigorous cost-benefit evaluation planned from the outset. Future research should focus on the cost-effectiveness of simple, low-cost interventions, and further explore impacts on job retention.
机译:目的。评估社区和工作场所的干预措施的有效性,以减少患有肌肉骨骼疾病(MSD)的工人的病假和失业。方法。自1990年以来发布的相关随机对照试验(RCT)和队列研究,是通过筛选35篇较早的系统评价的引文,并通过搜索MEDLINE和Embase直至2010年4月进行鉴定的。通过干预类别和其他特征(包括研究质量)来评估效果。结果。在42项研究(包括34项RCT)中,有27项评估了重返工作(RTW),21例病假持续时间和5项失业。干预措施包括运动疗法,行为改变技术,适应工作场所和提供其他服务。研究通常较小{中位数样本107 [四分位间距(IQR)77-148]},并且质量有限。大多数干预措施似乎是有益的:RTW的中位相对风险(RR)为1.21(IQR 1.00-1.60),避免与MSD相关的工作损失的中位相对风险为1.25(IQR 1.06-1.71);疾病缺席的中位数减少为1.11(IQR 0.32-3.20)天/月。但是,在规模更大,质量更高的研究中,其影响较小,表明出版物存在偏见。尽管费力的干预措施没有简单干预措施有效,但没有干预措施明显优越。没有成本效益分析建立统计上显着的净经济效益。结论。由于收益很小,成本效益令人怀疑,因此雇主的做法应以对不确定性的价值判断为指导。仅从一开始就计划严格的成本效益评估,就应实施昂贵的干预措施。未来的研究应侧重于简单,低成本干预措施的成本效益,并进一步探讨对保留工作的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号