首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Rheumatology (Oxford England) >Effectiveness of community- and workplace-based interventions to manage musculoskeletal-related sickness absence and job loss – a systematic review
【2h】

Effectiveness of community- and workplace-based interventions to manage musculoskeletal-related sickness absence and job loss – a systematic review

机译:基于社区和工作场所的干预措施对管理与肌肉骨骼有关的疾病缺勤和失业的有效性–系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This systematic review assesses the effectiveness of interventions in community and workplace settings to reduce sickness absence and job loss in workers with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). Relevant studies (randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies published since 1990) were identified by screening citations in 35 earlier systematic reviews and from searches of Medline and Embase to April 2010. Among 42 studies (54 reports) including 34 RCTs, 27 assessed return to work, 21 duration of sickness absence, and five job loss. Interventions included exercise therapy, behavioural change techniques, workplace adaptations and provision of additional services. Studies were typically small (median sample size 107 (inter-quartile range (IQR) 77 to 148) and limited in quality. Most interventions were reported as beneficial: the median relative risk (RR) for return to work was 1.21 (IQR 1.00 – 1.60) and that for avoiding MSD-related job loss, 1.25 (IQR 1.06-1.71); the median reduction in sickness absence was 1.11 (IQR 0.32 to 3.20) days/month. However, effects were smaller in the larger and better quality studies, suggesting publication bias. No intervention was clearly superior to others, although effort-intensive interventions were less effective than simple ones. No cost-benefit analyses established statistically significant net economic benefits. Given that benefits are small and of doubtful cost-effectiveness, employers’ practice should be guided by their value judgements about the uncertainties. Expensive interventions should be implemented only with rigorous cost-benefit evaluation planned from the outset. Future research should focus on the cost-effectiveness of simple low cost interventions, and further explore impacts on job retention.
机译:这项系统的评估评估了社区和工作场所干预措施的有效性,以减少患有肌肉骨骼疾病(MSDs)的工人的疾病和工作机会。通过在35篇较早的系统评价中以及从Medline和Embase到2010年4月的检索中筛选引文,确定了相关研究(随机对照试验(RCT)和队列研究自1990年以来发表)。在42项研究(54篇报告)中,包括34篇RCT,评估了27篇重返工作岗位,21个病假时间和5个失业。干预措施包括运动疗法,行为改变技术,适应工作场所和提供其他服务。研究通常规模较小(样本量中位数为107(四分位数间距(IQR)77至148)),质量有限。据报道大多数干预措施是有益的:重返工作的中位相对风险(RR)为1.21(IQR 1.00 – 1.60)和为避免与M​​SD相关的工作而失业的人数为1.25(IQR 1.06-1.71);疾病缺勤的中位数减少量为1.11(IQR 0.32至3.20)天/月,但是,规模较大且质量更好的研究的效果较小,这表明出版物存在偏见,尽管费力的干预措施没有简单干预措施有效,但没有干预措施明显优于其他干预措施;成本效益分析没有建立统计上显着的净经济效益;由于收益很小且成本效益令人怀疑,雇主'实践应以其对不确定性的价值判断为指导,昂贵的干预措施应仅从一开始就计划严格的成本效益评估,然后再进行研究。简单的低成本干预措施的成本效益,并进一步探讨对保留工作的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号