...
首页> 外文期刊>Resuscitation. >Supraglottic airway devices during neonatal resuscitation: An historical perspective, systematic review and meta-analysis of available clinical trials
【24h】

Supraglottic airway devices during neonatal resuscitation: An historical perspective, systematic review and meta-analysis of available clinical trials

机译:新生儿复苏过程中的声门上气道设备:历史回顾,系统评价和可用的临床试验的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Introduction Various supraglottic airway devices are routinely used to maintain airway patency in children and adults. However, oropharyngeal airways or laryngeal masks (LM) are not routinely used during neonatal resuscitation. The aim of this article was to review the available literature about the use of supraglottic airway devices during neonatal resuscitation. We reviewed books, resuscitation manuals and articles from 1830 to the present using the search terms "Infant", "Newborn", "Delivery Room", "Resuscitation", "Airway management", "Positive Pressure Respiration", "Oropharyngeal Airway" and "Laryngeal Mask". No study was identified using oropharyngeal airways during neonatal resuscitation. Four trials including 509 infants compared positive pressure ventilation with a LM, bag and mask or an endotracheal tube. Infants in the LM group were intubated less frequently compared to infants in the bag and mask ventilation group 4/275 vs. 28/234 (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.05-0.34). Infants resuscitated with the LM had significantly less unsuccessful resuscitations 4/275 vs. 31/234 (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.03-0.28). Two trials including 34 preterm infants compared surfactant administration via LM vs. endotracheal tube. LM surfactant administration was safe and no adverse events were reported. The efficacy and safety of oropharyngeal airways during neonatal resuscitation remain unclear and randomized trials are required. The current evidence suggests that resuscitation with a LM is a feasible and safe alternative to mask ventilation in infants >34 weeks gestation and birth weight >2000 sp="0.25"g. However, further randomized control trials are needed to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes following use of laryngeal masks. In addition, surfactant administration via LM should be used only within clinical trials.
机译:引言常规使用各种声门上气道装置来维持儿童和成人的气道通畅。但是,新生儿复苏期间通常不使用口咽气道或喉罩(LM)。本文的目的是回顾有关新生儿复苏期间声门上气道装置使用的现有文献。我们使用搜索词“婴儿”,“新生儿”,“产房”,“复苏”,“气道管理”,“正压呼吸”,“口咽气道”和“ “喉罩”。新生儿复苏期间未使用口咽气道进行研究。包括509名婴儿在内的四项试验对正压通气与LM,袋和口罩或气管插管进行了比较。与袋装和面罩通气组的婴儿相比,LM组的婴儿进行插管的频率较低,分别为4/275和28/234(OR 0.13,95%CI 0.05-0.34)。用LM复苏的婴儿未成功复苏的比例显着降低,分别为4/275和31/234(OR 0.10,95%CI 0.03-0.28)。包括34个早产儿在内的两项试验比较了通过LM与气管插管施用表面活性剂的情况。 LM表面活性剂的给药是安全的,没有不良反应的报道。新生儿复苏过程中口咽气道的疗效和安全性尚不清楚,需要进行随机试验。目前的证据表明,对于≥34周妊娠和出生体重> 2000 sp =“ 0.25” g的婴儿,用LM进行复苏是替代面罩通气的可行且安全的替代方法。但是,需要进一步的随机对照试验来评估使用喉罩后的短期和长期结果。此外,通过LM施用表面活性剂仅应在临床试验中使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号