首页> 外文期刊>Respiratory medicine >Prevalence of psychiatric morbidity in a difficult asthma population: Relationship to asthma outcome.
【24h】

Prevalence of psychiatric morbidity in a difficult asthma population: Relationship to asthma outcome.

机译:困难哮喘人群中精神疾病的患病率:与哮喘预后的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Psychiatric morbidity appears common in fatal and near-fatal asthma and may be a factor in difficult to control asthmatic subjects. We examined the prevalence of psychiatric morbidity (using psychiatric interview) in a cohort of sequentially referred poorly controlled asthmatics and related this to (a) asthma outcome (b) assessing chest physician opinion and (c) Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS). METHODS: Patients were evaluated using a systematic evaluation protocol to identify and manage all co-morbidity. Psychiatric assessment was performed by experienced liaison psychiatrists and ICD10 diagnosis and treatment programme assigned. Subjects completed HADS at presentation and follow-up. Asthma was managed according to BTS/SIGN Guidelines. RESULTS: Of 65 subjects who attended for psychiatric interview, 32 (49%) had an ICD10 diagnosis, (6 (9%) previously identified) with depression most common (59%). Physician assessment had poor discrimination for psychiatric illness. Anxiety scores(13.4+/-0.8 vs. 8.5+/-0.7) and depression scores (10.2+/-0.7 vs. 4.8+/-0.5) scores were significantly higher in subjects with ICD10 diagnosis (P<0.001), who were also more likely to be current smokers (P<0.01). HADS had a poor positive predictive value for psychiatric illness but a good negative predictive value for depression. There was no relationship between ICD10 diagnosis and asthma outcome. Subjects identified as therapy-resistant asthma after systematic evaluation, had significantly lower depression scores after treatment (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: In difficult asthmatics, there is a high prevalence of undiagnosed psychiatric morbidity, with depression being particularly prevalent. A simple screening questionnaire such as HADS, has a high false positive rate when compared to psychiatric interview, but may be useful in excluding depressive illness. There appears to be little association between identification and management of co-existent psychiatry morbidity and asthma outcome.
机译:简介:精神疾病的发病率在致命和近乎致命的哮喘中很常见,并且可能是难以控制哮喘患者的一个因素。我们在一组依序转诊,控制不佳的哮喘患者中检查了精神疾病的患病率(使用精神病学访谈),并将其与(a)哮喘结果(b)评估胸科医生的意见和(c)医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)相关。方法:使用系统评估方案对患者进行评估,以识别和管理所有合并症。由经验丰富的联络精神科医生进行精神病学评估,并分配ICD10诊断和治疗计划。受试者在演讲​​和随访中完成了HADS。根据BTS / SIGN指南管理哮喘。结果:在参加精神病学访谈的65名受试者中,有32名(49%)被诊断为ICD10,(先前已确定为6名(9%)),其中抑郁症最为常见(59%)。医师评估对精神疾病的辨别能力较差。患有ICD10诊断的受试者的焦虑评分(13.4 +/- 0.8 vs. 8.5 +/- 0.7)和抑郁评分(10.2 +/- 0.7 vs. 4.8 +/- 0.5)显着更高(P <0.001)也更可能是目前的吸烟者(P <0.01)。 HADS对精神疾病的阳性预测值较差,而对抑郁症的阴性预测值较差。 ICD10诊断与哮喘预后之间没有关系。经过系统评估后确定为抗药性哮喘的受试者,治疗后抑郁评分显着降低(P <0.05)。结论:在困难的哮喘患者中,未诊断的精神病发病率很高,尤其是抑郁症。与精神病访谈相比,简单的筛查问卷(例如HADS)具有较高的假阳性率,但在排除抑郁症方面可能很有用。并存的精神病学发病率和哮喘预后的识别和管理之间似乎没有关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号