首页> 外文期刊>Respiratory medicine >Control of asthma in children: still unacceptable? A French cross-sectional study.
【24h】

Control of asthma in children: still unacceptable? A French cross-sectional study.

机译:控制儿童哮喘:仍然不能接受?法国横断面研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The goal of asthma management focuses on adequate control of asthma, although little is known about the optimal level of asthma control to be reached. The ELIOS study was conducted in France to address this lack of information. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of asthmatic children (4-15 years) visiting their medical practitioner. The primary objective was to assess the level of asthma control with a 3-level composite score based on French (ANAES) guidelines criteria (optimal, acceptable, and unacceptable). RESULTS: Asthma control was assessed in 3431 children and classified as optimal (26%), acceptable (41.3%), and unacceptable (32.7%). When PEFR was studied, asthma control was optimal in 23.0%, acceptable in 35.8% and unacceptable in 41.2% (p<0.001) of children. Unacceptable asthma control was significantly associated with higher BMI (p=0.002), more recent diagnosis of asthma (p=0.008), passive exposure to parental tobacco smoke (p<0.001), number of associated allergic diseases (p<0.001), frequent respiratory tract infections (p<0.001) and low socioeconomic status (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis identified presence of respiratory tract infections (p<0.0001), passive exposure to parental tobacco smoke (p=0.009) and low socioeconomic status (p=0.042) as variables associated with unacceptable asthma control. CONCLUSIONS: There is room for improvement in France as only 25% of asthmatic children are optimally controlled. Public health strategies should increase awareness among physicians and parents about the importance of using asthma control tools, eliminating exposure to tobacco smoke and treating associated allergic diseases.
机译:背景:哮喘控制的目标集中在对哮喘的充分控制上,尽管对达到最佳哮喘控制水平知之甚少。 ELIOS研究是在法国进行的,目的是解决信息不足的问题。方法:对就医的哮喘儿童(4-15岁)进行横断面研究。主要目标是根据法国(ANAES)指南标准(最佳,可接受和不可接受)以3级综合评分评估哮喘控制水平。结果:对3431名儿童进行了哮喘控制评估,分为最佳(26%),可接受(41.3%)和不可接受(32.7%)。在研究PEFR时,哮喘控制的最佳儿童率为23.0%,可接受的为35.8%,不能接受的为41.2%(p <0.001)。不可接受的哮喘控制与较高的BMI(p = 0.002),较新的哮喘诊断(p = 0.008),被动接触父母的烟草烟雾(p <0.001),相关的过敏性疾病数(p <0.001)显着相关呼吸道感染(p <0.001)和低社会经济地位(p <0.001)。多变量分析确定存在呼吸道感染(p <0.0001),被动接触父母烟草烟雾(p = 0.009)和低社会经济地位(p = 0.042)是与哮喘控制不可接受相关的变量。结论:法国有改善的空间,因为只有25%的哮喘儿童得到了最佳控制。公共卫生策略应提高医生和家长对使用哮喘控制工具,消除接触烟草烟雾和治疗相关过敏性疾病的重要性的认识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号