首页> 外文期刊>Respiratory medicine >Comparison of the efficacy and safety of high doses of beclometasone dipropionate suspension for nebulization and beclometasone dipropionate via a metered-dose inhaler in steroid-dependent adults with moderate to severe asthma.
【24h】

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of high doses of beclometasone dipropionate suspension for nebulization and beclometasone dipropionate via a metered-dose inhaler in steroid-dependent adults with moderate to severe asthma.

机译:在中度至严重哮喘患者中,大剂量吸入倍他米松双丙酸酯悬浮液雾化和通过计量吸入器雾化倍他米松双丙酸酯的疗效和安全性比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Nebulization for the administration of high doses of inhaled corticosteroids can benefit steroid-dependent asthmatics. The objective of this double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre, randomized, parallel-group study was to compare the efficacy and safety of high-dose corticosteroids given by nebulization or metered-dose inhalation in adult patients with asthma. Following a 2-week run-in period, 124 patients, aged 18-70 years, with moderate to severe asthma treated with high-dose inhaled steroids were randomized to one of two treatment groups for 12 weeks: beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) suspension for nebulization 3,000-4,000 microgday(-1) b.i.d. given via a nebulizer (n = 63), or BDP spray 1,500-2000 microgday(-1) b.i.d. given via a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) plus spacer (BDP MDI) (n = 61). Comparable improvements over baseline, which were statistically significant in most cases, were reported at study end for the two treatment groups in the various efficacy parameters evaluated (pulmonary function tests, clinical symptoms scores, and the use of rescue salbutamol).The primary efficacy endpoint was morning pulmonary expiratory flow rate (PEFR). For the intent-to-treat population, in the BDP nebulization group mean morning PEFR increased statistically significantly from 308.7 +/- 107.81 min(-1) to 3 19.2 +/- 104.01 min(-1) while in the BDP MDI group the increase was from 301.5 +/- 94.71 min(-1) to 309.3 +/- 86.71 min(-1). The two treatments were equally well tolerated.A total of 19 patients in each group reported adverse events during the treatment period, and these were generally mild-moderate in severity. In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that BDP suspension for nebulization 3,000-4,000 microg day(-1) given via a nebulizer and BDP spray 1,500-2,000 microg day(-1) given via an MDI plus spacer are equally effective, with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile, when used in steroid-dependent adult patients with moderate to severe asthma.
机译:雾化给药高剂量吸入皮质类固醇激素可使类固醇依赖性哮喘患者受益。这项双盲,双模拟,多中心,随机,平行分组研究的目的是比较雾化或定量吸入对成年哮喘患者给予大剂量皮质类固醇的疗效和安全性。经过2周的磨合期后,将124例年龄在18-70岁之间,接受大剂量吸入类固醇治疗的中度至重度哮喘的患者随机分为两个治疗组之一进行12周的治疗:倍氯米松双丙酸酯(BDP)悬液治疗雾化3,000-4,000 microgday(-1)投标通过喷雾器(n = 63)或BDP喷洒1,500-2000 microgday(-1)b.i.d.通过定量吸入器(MDI)和垫片(BDP MDI)给出(n = 61)。在研究结束时,两个治疗组在评估的各种功效参数(肺功能测试,临床症状评分和使用沙丁胺醇的使用)中报告了在基线时可比的改善,这在大多数情况下具有统计学意义。是早晨肺呼气流速(PEFR)。对于意向性治疗人群,在BDP雾化组中,平均早晨PEFR从308.7 +/- 107.81 min(-1)增至3 19.2 +/- 104.01 min(-1),在统计学上显着增加,而在BDP MDI组中,增加从301.5 +/- 94.71分钟(-1)增加到309.3 +/- 86.71分钟(-1)。两种疗法的耐受性相同,每组中共有19位患者在治疗期间报告了不良事件,严重程度一般为中度。总之,这项研究的结果表明,通过雾化器给予的3,000-4,000微克天(-1)的雾化BDP悬浮液和通过MDI加间隔器给予的1,500-2,000微克天(-1)的BDP喷雾是同等有效的,当用于中度至重度哮喘的类固醇依赖性成年患者时,可接受的安全性和耐受性特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号