首页> 外文期刊>Respiratory care >Physicochemical Aspects and Efficiency of Albuterol Nebulization: Comparison of Three Aerosol Types in an In Vitro Pediatric Model
【24h】

Physicochemical Aspects and Efficiency of Albuterol Nebulization: Comparison of Three Aerosol Types in an In Vitro Pediatric Model

机译:沙丁胺醇雾化的理化特性和效率:三种儿科气雾剂在体外儿科模型中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Advances in nebulizer design have produced both ultrasonic nebulizers and devices based on a vibrating mesh (vibrating mesh nebulizers), which are expected to enhance the efficiency of aerosol drug therapy. The aim of this study was to compare 4 different nebulizers, of 3 different types, in an in vitro model using albuterol delivery and physical characteristics as benchmarks. METHODS: The following nebulizers were tested: Sidestream Disposable jet nebulizer, Multisonic Infra Control ultrasonic nebulizer, and the Aerogen Pro and Aerogen Solo vibrating mesh nebulizers. Aerosol duration, temperature, and drug solution osmolality were measured during nebulization. Albuterol delivery was measured by a high-performance liquid chromatography system with fluorometric detection. The droplet size distribution was analyzed with a laser granulometer. RESULTS: The ultrasonic nebulizer was the fastest device based on the duration of nebulization; the jet nebulizer was the slowest. Solution temperature decreased during nebulization when the jet nebulizer and vibrating mesh nebulizers were used, but it increased with the ultrasonic nebulizer. Osmolality was stable during nebulization with the vibrating mesh nebulizers, but increased with the jet nebulizer and ultrasonic nebulizer, indicating solvent evaporation. Albuterol delivery was 1.6 and 2.3 times higher with the ultrasonic nebulizer and vibrating mesh nebulizers devices, respectively, than with the jet nebulizer. Particle size was significantly higher with the ultrasonic nebulizer. CONCLUSIONS: The in vitro model was effective for comparing nebulizer types, demonstrating important differences between nebulizer types. The new devices, both the ultrasonic nebulizers and vibrating mesh nebulizers, delivered more aerosolized drug than traditional jet nebulizers.
机译:背景技术:雾化器设计的进步已经产生了超声雾化器和基于振动筛网的设备(振动筛网雾化器),它们有望提高气雾药物治疗的效率。这项研究的目的是在体外模型中以沙丁胺醇输送和物理特性为基准,比较3种不同类型的4种不同雾化器。方法:测试了以下雾化器:Sidestream一次性喷射雾化器,Multisonic Infra Control超声雾化器以及Aerogen Pro和Aerogen Solo振动筛网雾化器。在雾化期间测量气溶胶持续时间,温度和药物溶液的重量克分子渗透压浓度。通过高效液相色谱系统和荧光检测法测定丁烯醇的释放量。用激光粒度仪分析液滴尺寸分布。结果:基于雾化的持续时间,超声波雾化器是最快的设备;喷射雾化器是最慢的。当使用喷射雾化器和振动筛孔雾化器时,在雾化过程中溶液温度降低,但随着超声雾化器的增加,溶液温度升高。在使用振动筛网雾化器的雾化过程中,重量克分子渗透浓度是稳定的,但随着喷射雾化器和超声雾化器的重量摩尔渗透压浓度的升高,表明溶剂已蒸发。超声波雾化器和振动筛网雾化器装置分别比喷射雾化器高出1.6倍和2.3倍的沙丁胺醇输送量。超声雾化器的粒径明显更高。结论:体外模型可有效比较雾化器类型,表明雾化器类型之间存在重要差异。与传统的喷射雾化器相比,超声雾化器和振动筛网雾化器这两种新设备可提供更多的雾化药物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号