首页> 外文期刊>Retina >Comparison of spectral-domain and time-domain optical coherence tomography in the detection of neovascular age-related macular degeneration activity
【24h】

Comparison of spectral-domain and time-domain optical coherence tomography in the detection of neovascular age-related macular degeneration activity

机译:光谱域和时域光学相干断层扫描在检测新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性活动中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare the sensitivity of commonly used time-domain (TD-OCT) and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography platforms and scanning modalities in the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration in a population with a high prevalence of exudative disease activity. Methods: Fifty consecutive patients within the prospective SAVE (Super-dose Anti-Vascular Endothelial growth factor) trial, which analyzed the utility of 2.0 mg intravitreal ranibizumab for the treatment of recalcitrant neovascular age-related macular degeneration, were enrolled in a comparison trial of 3 different optical coherence tomography (OCT) platforms. Stratus TD-OCT radial scan (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc) was compared with 3 Heidelberg Spectralis Heidelberg Retinal Angiograph+OCT (Heidelberg Engineering) acquisition settings (radial, 7-line raster, volumetric) and 2 Cirrus high definition (HD)-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc) acquisition settings (5-line raster, volumetric). Results: Using every imaging platform and acquisition setting, evidence of exudative disease activity was positively identified in 163 of 191 patient visits (85.3%). Intraretinal cysts were identified in 83 of 191 visits (43.5%), and subretinal fluid was identified in 116 of 191 visits (60.7%). Of these positive visits, the Stratus TD-OCT radial scanning technology demonstrated a significantly lower rate of detection (71.8%) when compared with the Spectralis HRA+OCT spectral domain scanning modalities (radial 87.1%, P < 0.001; 7-line raster 92.0%, P < 0.001; volumetric 94.5%, P < 0.001) or the Cirrus HD-OCT spectral domain scanning modalities (5-line raster 81.6%, P = 0.001; volumetric 92.0%, P < 0.001). Intraretinal cysts and subretinal fluid were identified in 83 visits (43.5%) and 116 visits (60.7%), respectively, with 36 eyes (18.8%) having fluid in both locations. No individual imaging modality demonstrated a diagnostic advantage for detecting subretinal fluid versus intraretinal cysts (e.g., Cirrus volume detected 86.7% of intraretinal cysts and 88.8% of subretinal fluid, P = 0.33). Conclusion: In this neovascular age-related macular degeneration patient population, spectral-domain ocular coherence tomography was a superior diagnostic tool when compared with TD-OCT, with each spectral domain platform and acquisition setting identifying significantly more exudative disease activity. The two spectral domain platforms (Cirrus and Spectralis) were not directly compared because identical image acquisition parameters were not used. No individual imaging modality demonstrated a diagnostic advantage for detecting subretinal fluid versus intraretinal cysts.
机译:目的:比较在流行性渗出疾病活跃度较高的人群中,新时域(TD-OCT)和光谱域光学相干断层扫描平台以及扫描方式在新血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的管理中的敏感性。方法:在前瞻性SAVE(超剂量抗血管内皮生长因子)试验中连续入选50名患者,该研究分析了2.0 mg玻璃体内雷珠单抗治疗顽固性新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的作用, 3种不同的光学相干断层扫描(OCT)平台。将Stratus TD-OCT径向扫描仪(Carl Zeiss Meditec,Inc)与3台Heidelberg Spectralis Heidelberg视网膜血管造影仪+ OCT(Heidelberg Engineering)采集设置(径向,7行光栅,体积)和2个Cirrus高清晰度(HD)-OCT进行了比较(Carl Zeiss Meditec,Inc)采集设置(5行栅格,体积)。结果:使用每个成像平台和采集设置,在191位患者中有163位患者(85.3%)积极鉴定了渗出性疾病活动的证据。 191次就诊中有83例(43.5%)检出了视网膜内囊肿,191次就诊中有116例(60.7%)检出了视网膜下液。在这些积极的拜访中,与Spectralis HRA + OCT光谱域扫描方式(径向87.1%,P <0.001; 7线光栅92.0)相比,Stratus TD-OCT径向扫描技术显示出明显更低的检测率(71.8%)。 %,P <0.001;体积94.5%,P <0.001)或Cirrus HD-OCT光谱域扫描方式(5行光栅81.6%,P = 0.001;体积92.0%,P <0.001)。分别在83次就诊(43.5%)和116次就诊(60.7%)中识别出了视网膜内囊肿和视网膜下积液,其中36个眼(18.8%)在两个部位都有积液。没有单独的影像学方法显示出相对于视网膜内囊肿检测视网膜下液的诊断优势(例如,Cirrus量检测出视网膜内囊肿的86.7%和视网膜下液的88.8%,P = 0.33)。结论:在这种与年龄相关的新血管性黄斑变性患者人群中,与TD-OCT相比,频谱域眼相干断层扫描是一种出色的诊断工具,每个频谱域平台和采集设置可识别出明显更多的渗出性疾病活动。由于未使用相同的图像采集参数,因此未直接比较两个光谱域平台(Cirrus和Spectralis)。没有任何一种单独的成像方法显示出相对于视网膜内囊肿检测视网膜下液的诊断优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号