首页> 外文期刊>Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology: RTP >Chemistry, manufacturing and exposure assessments to support generally recognized as safe (GRAS) determinations
【24h】

Chemistry, manufacturing and exposure assessments to support generally recognized as safe (GRAS) determinations

机译:化学,制造和暴露评估,以支持公认的安全(GRAS)确定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Identity, stability, purity, intended use levels in what foods and technical effects, and probable intake are among the key components in an assessment to support GRAS determinations. The specifications of identity of a food substance are an important component of the safety assessment as changes in the physical and chemical properties of a food substance can influence its technical effect in food and can influence its nutritional or toxicological properties of the food substance. Estimating exposure is a key determining step in the safety evaluation of a food substance. Intake assessment in GRAS determination is necessarily comprehensive based on cumulative exposure, i.e. proposed new uses plus background dietary exposure. Intake estimates for safety assurance in a GRAS determination also represent conservative overestimate of chronic exposure as they are based on 2-day average daily intake and the upper percentile (90th) intake among consumers. In contrast, in a nutrient assessment where realistic intake estimates are of interest, usual intake estimates are relied upon. It should also be noted that intake estimates for GRAS determinations are also more conservative than estimate of dietary exposure by EPA (FIFRA), where mean per capita are used to assess chronic exposure. Overall, for safety assurance, intake assessments in GRAS determinations are comprehensively cumulative and typically conservative over-estimate of exposures. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc.
机译:鉴定,稳定性,纯度,食品和技术效果的预期使用水平以及可能的摄入量是支持GRAS测定的评估的关键组成部分。食品物质的特性说明是安全性评估的重要组成部分,因为食品物质的物理和化学性质的变化会影响其在食品中的技术效果,并且会影响其在食品物质中的营养或毒理学性质。估计接触量是食品安全性评估中的关键决定步骤。确定GRAS的摄入量评估必须基于累积暴露量(即建议的新用途和背景饮食摄入量)进行全面评估。 GRAS测定中用于安全保证的摄入量估算值也代表了对慢性暴露的保守估计,因为它们是基于2天平均每日摄入量和消费者中较高的百分位(第90位)摄入量。相反,在关注实际摄入量估算值的营养评估中,通常会采用摄入量估算值。还应注意,GRAS测定的摄入量估算值也比EPA(FIFRA)的膳食摄入量估算值更为保守,后者使用人均均值来评估慢性暴露量。总体而言,为了安全起见,GRAS确定中的摄入量评估是全面累积的,通常保守地高估暴露量。 (C)2016由Elsevier Inc.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号