首页> 外文期刊>Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology: RTP >The value of acute toxicity studies to support the clinical management of overdose and poisoning: a cross-discipline consensus.
【24h】

The value of acute toxicity studies to support the clinical management of overdose and poisoning: a cross-discipline consensus.

机译:急性毒性研究对支持药物过量和中毒的临床管理的价值:跨学科共识。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Acute toxicity studies are no longer required to support first clinical trials of pharmaceuticals in man. However, it is unclear in the wording of the revised ICH M3 whether acute toxicity studies are required later in drug development (e.g., phase 3) in order to support the management of overdose. The NC3Rs held a workshop in January 2010 with representatives from international poison centres, the pharmaceutical and chemical industries, and regulatory and government bodies to explore further whether acute toxicity studies are used to support the clinical management of overdose of pharmaceuticals and whether this work can be translated to other sectors such as the chemical industry. The consensus formed at the workshop was that acute toxicity studies are not used for managing overdose of pharmaceuticals and are of little value in treating human poisoning from chemicals. In this paper, the authors describe the key considerations in treating human overdose and poisoning, challenge the value of the classification and labelling process of chemicals for this purpose and discuss how acute toxicity studies can be improved to better inform risk assessment.
机译:不再需要急性毒性研究来支持人类药物的首次临床试验。但是,尚不清楚在修订的ICH M3的措词中是否需要在药物开发后期(例如,第3阶段)进行急性毒性研究,以支持药物过量的管理。 NC3R在2010年1月与国际毒物中心,制药和化学工业以及监管和政府机构的代表举行了研讨会,以进一步探讨是否使用急性毒性研究来支持药物过量的临床管理以及这项工作是否可以进行。翻译到其他行业,例如化学工业。研讨会上达成的共识是,急性毒性研究并未用于管理药物过量,对治疗化学药品中毒的人几乎没有价值。在本文中,作者描述了治疗人用药过量和中毒的关键考虑因素,为此目的挑战了化学品分类和标记过程的价值,并讨论了如何改善急性毒性研究以更好地为风险评估提供依据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号