...
首页> 外文期刊>Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology: RTP >Toxicity study of a new camptothecin anti-cancer agent CKD-602 in dogs: 4-week continuous intravenous dose by infusion pump and 4-week repeated intravenous dose.
【24h】

Toxicity study of a new camptothecin anti-cancer agent CKD-602 in dogs: 4-week continuous intravenous dose by infusion pump and 4-week repeated intravenous dose.

机译:新型喜树碱抗癌药CKD-602对犬的毒性研究:通过输液泵连续4周静脉内剂量和4周重复静脉内剂量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In evaluating toxicity, one of the most important factors is the administration method, because it can affect the exposure and absorbance level of the test article, and, consequently, influence the interpretation of toxicity test results. Continuous intravenous (IV) administration is a widely used administration method for anti-cancer drugs in clinical settings. Previous studies have reported the toxic effects of the test article following repeated IV dosing of CKD-602, a novel camptothecin-derivative anti-tumor agent that was developed by Chong Kun Dang Pharmaceutical Corporation in Seoul, Korea. However, CKD-602-related toxicities induced by IV infusion administration have not yet been evaluated, although the drug is more widely used in clinical settings. In the present study, CKD-602 was administered using a continuous IV infusion pump and using repeated IV administration at doses of 0, 0.003, or 0.01 mg/kg/day for 4 weeks to compare and evaluate the drug-induced toxicities using the two different administration methods. Higher mortality, more severe clinical symptoms, increased complete blood count, serum biochemistry, and histopathology were demonstrated when CKD-602 was administered using the 4-week continuous IV infusion pump method compared with the repeated IV administration method. Based on these results, we conclude that the administration of CKD-602 using the 4-week continuous IV infusion pump method can elicit more severe toxicity than that using 4-week repeated IV dosing method. Thus, more attention should be paid to the administration of CKD-602 using continuous IV infusion in the clinical setting.
机译:在评估毒性时,最重要的因素之一是给药方法,因为它会影响测试物品的暴露和吸光度水平,从而影响毒性测试结果的解释。连续静脉(IV)给药是临床环境中抗癌药物的广泛使用给药方法。先前的研究已经报道了在韩国首尔的Chong Kun Dang Pharmaceutical Corporation开发的新型喜树碱衍生物抗肿瘤剂CKD-602的重复静脉给药后,该测试物品的毒性作用。然而,尽管该药物在临床环境中被更广泛地使用,但尚未评估通过静脉输注给药引起的与CKD-602相关的毒性。在本研究中,CKD-602使用连续静脉输液泵给药,并以0、0.003或0.01 mg / kg / day的剂量反复静脉给药4周,以比较和评估这两种药物引起的毒性不同的管理方式。与连续静脉输注方法相比,使用4周连续静脉输液泵方法给予CKD-602可以显示更高的死亡率,更严重的临床症状,增加的全血细胞计数,血清生物化学和组织病理学。根据这些结果,我们得出结论,使用4周连续IV输液泵方法的CKD-602给药比使用4周重复IV给药方法的毒性更大。因此,在临床环境中应更加注意连续静脉输注CKD-602的给药。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号