首页> 外文期刊>Research in developmental disabilities >Considering student choice when selecting instructional strategies: a comparison of three prompting systems.
【24h】

Considering student choice when selecting instructional strategies: a comparison of three prompting systems.

机译:选择教学策略时要考虑学生的选择:三种提示系统的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Three secondary age students with moderate intellectual disabilities learned to use the system of least prompts, a self-operated picture prompting system, and a self-operated auditory prompting system to use a copy machine and a debit machine. Both the effectiveness and efficiency of these prompting systems were compared. Additionally, student preference of instructional method was examined. The results demonstrated that each prompting system was effective and efficient with varying students when skill acquisition and duration of task performance were measured. All students demonstrated increased independence in completing both tasks. This study found that the preferred prompting systems were more effective in terms of both skill acquisition and duration for completing tasks for students.
机译:三名中度智力障碍的中学生学习了使用最少提示系统,一个自动图片提示系统以及一个自动听觉提示系统来使用复印机和借记机的方法。比较了这些提示系统的有效性和效率。此外,还检查了学生对教学方法的偏爱。结果表明,当测量技能获得和任务执行的持续时间时,每个提示系统对于变化的学生都是有效和高效的。所有学生在完成两项任务时都表现出更高的独立性。这项研究发现,就技能获得和完成学生任务的持续时间而言,首选的提示系统更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号