首页> 外文期刊>Research in autism spectrum disorders >Convergent validity of the Autism Spectrum Disorder-Diagnostic for Children (ASD-DC) and Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R)
【24h】

Convergent validity of the Autism Spectrum Disorder-Diagnostic for Children (ASD-DC) and Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R)

机译:儿童自闭症谱系障碍诊断(ASD-DC)和自闭症诊断面谈修订(ADI-R)的收敛效度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this paper was to further establish the validity of the Autism Spectrum Disorder-Diagnostic for Children (ASD-DC). The methodology consisted of testing the similarity of findings between the ASD-DC and the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R), which proved to be statistically significant for subscale content scores on social, communication, and rituals/insistence on sameness/restrictive interest subfactors. Secondly, the ASD-DC and ADI-R were compared to clinically derived diagnoses based on diagnostic interviews, rating scales, a DSM-IV/ICD-10 symptom checklist, observations of the child, clinical judgment, and an in-depth parent interview. Twenty-six children in the study met criteria for ASD while six did not. The ASD-DC correctly identified 73% of the ASD group and 67% of the controls, while the ADI-R correctly identified 46% of the ASD group and 100% of the controls. The implications of these data are discussed.
机译:本文的目的是进一步确定儿童自闭症谱系障碍诊断(ASD-DC)的有效性。该方法包括测试ASD-DC与自闭症诊断访谈修订版(ADI-R)的发现的相似性,事实证明,这对于社交,沟通和礼仪/坚持相同性/限制性的分量表内容得分具有统计学意义利息子因素。其次,根据诊断性访谈,评分量表,DSM-IV / ICD-10症状清单,对儿童的观察,临床判断以及对父母的深入访谈,将ASD-DC和ADI-R与临床诊断进行比较。研究中有26名儿童符合ASD标准,而有6名儿童没有达到ASD标准。 ASD-DC正确识别了73%的ASD组和67%的对照组,而ADI-R正确识别了46%的ASD组和100%的对照组。讨论了这些数据的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号