首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Liver fibrosis: Noninvasive assessment with acoustic radiation force impulse elastography - Comparison with FibroScan M and XL probes and FibroTest in patients with chronic liver disease
【24h】

Liver fibrosis: Noninvasive assessment with acoustic radiation force impulse elastography - Comparison with FibroScan M and XL probes and FibroTest in patients with chronic liver disease

机译:肝纤维化:使用声辐射力脉冲弹性成像技术进行的非侵入性评估-与FibroScan M和XL探针以及FibroTest在慢性肝病患者中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography with that of FibroScan M and XL probes and FibroTest in the staging of fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease. Materials and Methods: This study received ethics approval, and all participants provided written informed consent. A total of 321 consecutive patients with chronic liver disease who underwent liver biopsy were prospectively enrolled from April 2010 to May 2012. Liver disease was caused by viral hepatitis (n = 136), alcoholic or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis disorders (n = 113), or some other disease (n = 72). In each patient, liver stiffness was evaluated with ARFI elastography, M and XL probes, and FibroTest within 1 month before liver biopsy. Histologic staging of liver fibrosis served as the reference standard. Results: Liver stiffness measurement failure rates were 11.2% with the M probe (36 of 321 patients), 2.3% with the XL probe (six of 260 patients), and 0% with ARFI elastography (0 of 321 patients). Unreliable results with ARFI elastography were more frequent in obese patients (those with a body mass index of 30 kg/m 2 or more) (42 of 86 patients [48.8%] vs 34 of 235 patients [14.5%], P .0001). No significant difference was found between ARFI elastography and the M probe in the diagnosis of cirrhosis (area under under the receiver operating characteristic curve [Az], 0.88 vs 0.91; P = .12) or severe fibrosis (Az, 0.85 vs 0.89; P = .15); however, the M probe demonstrated better results in the diagnosis of moderate fibrosis (Az, 0.81 vs 0.88; P = .008). No significant difference was found between ARFI elastography and the XL probe in the diagnosis of moderate fibrosis, severe fibrosis, or cirrhosis. The diagnostic performance of ARFI elastography improved when it was applied in nonobese patients (Az of ARFI for cirrhosis and severe fibrosis = 0.92 and 0.91, respectively, in nonobese patients [P = .0002] and 0.63 and 0.63, respectively, in obese patients [P .0001]). Conclusion: ARFI elastography is reliable in the assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease, especially nonobese patients.
机译:目的:比较声辐射力脉冲(ARFI)弹性成像与FibroScan M和XL探针以及FibroTest在慢性肝病患者纤维化分期中的诊断性能。材料和方法:该研究获得伦理学批准,所有参与者均提供了书面知情同意书。从2010年4月至2012年5月,共入选321例接受肝活检的慢性肝病患者。肝病是由病毒性肝炎(n = 136),酒精性或非酒精性脂肪性肝炎疾病(n = 113)或某些其他疾病(n = 72)。在每位患者中,在肝活检前1个月内使用ARFI弹性成像,M和XL探针以及FibroTest评估肝硬度。肝纤维化的组织学分期为参考标准。结果:M探针(321例中的36例)的肝硬度测量失败率为11.2%,XL探针(260例中的6例)为2.3%,ARFI弹性成像术(321例中的0例)为0%。肥胖患者(体重指数为30 kg / m 2或更高)的ARFI弹性成像检查结果不可靠(86例患者中的42例[48.8%]比235例患者中的34例[14.5%],P <.0001 )。在肝硬化的诊断(接受者工作特征曲线下的区域[Az]下的面积,0.88 vs 0.91; P = .12)或严重纤维化(Az,0.85 vs 0.89; P)中,ARFI弹性成像和M探针之间没有发现显着差异。 = .15);然而,M探针在中度纤维化的诊断中显示出更好的结果(Az,0.81对0.88; P = 0.008)。在中度纤维化,严重纤维化或肝硬化的诊断中,ARFI弹性成像与XL探针之间没有发现显着差异。当将ARFI弹性成像技术用于非肥胖患者时,其诊断性能得到改善(ARFI肝硬化和严重纤维化的Az分别为0.92和0.91,在非肥胖患者中[P = .0002]和在肥胖患者中[0.63和0.63] P <.0001])。结论:ARFI弹性成像技术可以可靠地评估慢性肝病患者,特别是非肥胖患者的肝纤维化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号