首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Reducing error and improving efficiency during vascular interventional radiology: Implementation of a preprocedural team rehearsal
【24h】

Reducing error and improving efficiency during vascular interventional radiology: Implementation of a preprocedural team rehearsal

机译:减少血管介入放射学检查过程中的错误并提高效率:术前团队排练的实施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To determine the type and frequency of errors during vascular interventional radiology (VIR) and design and implement an intervention to reduce error and improve efficiency in this setting. Materials and Methods: Ethical guidance was sought from the Research Services Department at Imperial College London. Informed consent was not obtained. Field notes were recorded during 55 VIR procedures by a single observer. Two blinded assessors identified failures from field notes and categorized them into one or more errors by using a 22-part classification system. The potential to cause harm, disruption to procedural flow, and preventability of each failure was determined. A preprocedural team rehearsal (PPTR) was then designed and implemented to target frequent preventable potential failures. Thirty-three procedures were observed subsequently to determine the efficacy of the PPTR. Nonparametric statistical analysis was used to determine the effect of intervention on potential failure rates, potential to cause harm and procedural flow disruption scores (Mann-Whitney U test), and number of preventable failures (Fisher exact test). Results: Before intervention, 1197 potential failures were recorded, of which 54.6% were preventable. A total of 2040 errors were deemed to have occurred to produce these failures. Planning error (19.7%), staff absence (16.2%), equipment unavailability (12.2%), communication error (11.2%), and lack of safety consciousness (6.1%) were the most frequent errors, accounting for 65.4% of the total. After intervention, 352 potential failures were recorded. Classification resulted in 477 errors. Preventable failures decreased from 54.6% to 27.3% (P < .001) with implementation of PPTR. Potential failure rates per hour decreased from 18.8 to 9.2 (P < .001), with no increase in potential to cause harm or procedural flow disruption per failure. Conclusion: Failures during VIR procedures are largely because of ineffective planning, communication error, and equipment difficulties, rather than a result of technical or patient-related issues. Many of these potential failures are preventable. A PPTR is an effective means of targeting frequent preventable failures, reducing procedural delays and improving patient safety.
机译:目的:确定在血管介入放射学(VIR)期间发生错误的类型和频率,并设计并实施干预措施以减少这种情况下的错误并提高效率。材料和方法:向伦敦帝国大学研究服务部寻求道德指导。未获得知情同意。在55个VIR程序中,由一位观察员记录了现场记录。两名不知情的评估员从现场记录中识别出故障,并使用22个部分的分类系统将其分类为一个或多个错误。确定了造成伤害,程序流程中断以及每个故障的可预防性的可能性。然后设计并实施了程序前团队排练(PPTR),以针对频繁发生的可预防的潜在故障。随后观察了33个程序,以确定PPTR的功效。非参数统计分析用于确定干预对潜在失败率,潜在危害和程序流程中断评分(Mann-Whitney U检验)以及可预防失败的数量(Fisher精确检验)的影响。结果:干预之前,记录了1197例潜在故障,其中54.6%是可预防的。总共发生了2040个错误,这些错误被认为是导致这些失败的原因。最常见的错误是计划错误(19.7%),人员缺勤(16.2%),设备不可用(12.2%),通信错误(11.2%)和缺乏安全意识(6.1%),占总数的65.4%。 。干预后,记录了352个潜在故障。分类导致477个错误。通过实施PPTR,可预防的故障从54.6%降低到27.3%(P <.001)。每小时的潜在故障率从18.8降低到9.2(P <.001),而每次故障导致损害或程序流程中断的可能性没有增加。结论:VIR程序失败的原因主要是无效的计划,通信错误和设备困难,而不是技术或患者相关问题的结果。这些潜在的故障中有许多是可以避免的。 PPTR是针对频繁发生的可预防故障,减少程序延迟并提高患者安全性的有效手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号