首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Evaluation of rotator cuff tendon tears: Comparison of multidetector CT arthrography and 1.5-T MR arthrography
【24h】

Evaluation of rotator cuff tendon tears: Comparison of multidetector CT arthrography and 1.5-T MR arthrography

机译:肩袖腱撕裂的评估:多层螺旋CT造影和1.5-T MR造影的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomographic (CT) arthrography and 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography in the evaluation of rotator cuff lesions, with arthroscopic correlation. Materials and Methods: This study was approved by the institutional ethical committee, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. CT and MR arthrographic images prospectively obtained in 56 consecutive patients, following the same arthrographic procedure, were independently evaluated by two radiologists. Arthroscopy, performed within 1 month of the imaging, was used as the reference standard. Sensitivity and specificity of CT and MR arthrography were compared by using the McNemar test. Interobserver and intertechnique agreement for detecting rotator cuff lesions were measured and compared with κ and Z statistics. The Bland-Altman method was used to determine interobserver and intertechnique agreement for measuring tendon tears. For grading fatty infiltration of rotator cuff muscles, κ and Z statistics were used. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in sensitivity and specificity between CT arthrography and MR arthrography in depiction of rotator cuff lesions. The respective sensitivity and specificity of CT arthrography were 92% and 93%-97% for the supraspinatus, 100% and 77%-79% for the infraspinatus, 75%-88% and 85%-90% for the subscapularis, and 55%-65% and 100% for the biceps tendon. The respective sensitivity and specificity of MR arthrography were 96% and 83%-93% for the supraspinatus, 88%-100% and 81%-83% for the infraspinatus, 75%-88% and 90%-100% for the subscapularis, and 65%-85% and 100% for the biceps tendon. Interobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect (κ = 0.744-0.964 for CT arthrography; κ = 0.641-0.893 for MR arthrography), and intertechnique agreement was almost perfect (κ > 0.819). CT and MR arthrography both yielded moderate interobserver and intertechnique agreement for measuring rotator cuff tears and grading muscle fatty infiltration. Conclusion: Data suggest that CT and MR arthrography have similar diagnostic performance for the evaluation of rotator cuff tendon tears.
机译:目的:为了比较具有关节镜相关性的多检测器计算机断层扫描(CT)造影和1.5-T磁共振(MR)造影在评估肩袖损伤方面的诊断性能。材料和方法:本研究得到机构伦理委员会的批准,并获得所有患者的知情同意。由两名放射科医师独立评估了在56位连续患者中遵循相同的关节造影程序预期获得的CT和MR关节造影图像。影像学检查后1个月内进行的关节镜检查用作参考标准。使用McNemar测试比较了CT和MR关节造影的敏感性和特异性。测量观察者间和技术上的一致性,以检测肩袖损伤并与κ和Z统计进行比较。 Bland-Altman方法用于确定测量肌腱撕裂的观察者间和技术间的一致性。为了对肩袖肌肉的脂肪浸润进行分级,使用了κ和Z统计量。结果:CT关节造影和MR关节造影对肩袖损伤的敏感性和特异性无统计学差异。 CT关节造影的敏感性和特异性对于肩上肌分别为92%和93%-97%,对于蛛网下肌分别为100%和77%-79%,对于肩sub下肌分别为75%-88%和85%-90%,以及55二头肌腱为%-65%和100%。 MR关节造影的敏感性和特异性对于肩上肌分别为96%和83%-93%,对于蛛网下肌分别为88%-100%和81%-83%,对于肩cap下肌分别为75%-88%和90%-100% ,二头肌腱为65%-85%和100%。观察者之间的一致性基本达到或接近完美(CT关节造影的κ= 0.744-0.964; MR关节造影的κ= 0.641-0.893),而技术间的一致性也几乎完美(κ> 0.819)。 CT和MR关节造影均可以观察到中等水平的观察者间和技术上的一致性,可用于测量肩袖撕裂和分级肌肉脂肪浸润。结论:数据表明,CT和MR关节造影在评估肩袖腱撕裂方面具有相似的诊断性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号