...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Renal lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
【24h】

Renal lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

机译:肾脏病变:弥散加权成像与对比增强MR成像的特征。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with that of contrast material-enhanced (CE) MR imaging and to assess the performance of these examinations combined for the characterization of renal lesions, with MR follow-up and histopathologic analysis as the reference standards. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board waived the requirement of informed patient consent for this retrospective HIPAA-compliant study. One hundred nine renal lesions in 64 patients (46 men, 18 women; mean age, 60.7 years) were evaluated with CE MR imaging and breath-hold DW imaging performed with various b values. Renal lesions were characterized with use of CE MR criteria, and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were measured. The ADCs of benign and malignant lesions were compared at Mann-Whitney testing. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the accuracy of DW imaging and CE MR imaging in the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). RESULTS: The 109 renal lesions--81 benign lesions and 28 RCCs--had a mean diameter of 4.2 cm +/- 2.5 (standard deviation). The mean ADC for RCCs (1.41 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.61) was significantly lower (P < .0001) than that for benign lesions (2.23 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.87) at DW imaging performed with b values of 0, 400, and 800 sec/mm(2). At a cutoff ADC of less than or equal to 1.92 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec, the area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of DW imaging for the diagnosis of RCCs (excluding angiomyolipomas) were 0.856, 86%, and 80%, respectively. The corresponding AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of CE MR imaging were 0.944, 100%, and 89%, respectively. Combined DW and CE MR imaging had 96% specificity. The AUC for the DW imaging-based diagnosis of solid RCC versus oncocytoma was 0.854. Papillary RCCs had lower ADCs than nonpapillary RCCs. CONCLUSION: DW imaging can be used to characterize renal lesions; however, compared with CE MR imaging, it is less accurate. DW imaging can be used to differentiate solid RCCs from oncocytomas and characterize the histologic subtypes of RCC.
机译:目的:比较弥散加权(DW)磁共振(MR)成像和造影剂增强(CE)MR成像的诊断性能,并评估结合MR对肾脏病变进行表征的这些检查的性能随访和组织病理学分析为参考标准。材料和方法:机构审查委员会放弃了这项追溯性的符合HIPAA的研究的患者知情同意的要求。通过CE MR成像和屏气DW成像(不同b值)评估了64例患者中的109个肾脏病变(男46例,女18例;平均年龄60.7岁)。使用CE MR标准对肾脏病变进行表征,并测量表观扩散系数(ADC)。在Mann-Whitney测试中比较了良性和恶性病变的ADC。进行受试者工作特征(ROC)分析以评估DW成像和CE MR成像在诊断肾细胞癌(RCC)中的准确性。结果:109个肾脏病变-81个良性病变和28个RCC-平均直径为4.2 cm +/- 2.5(标准差)。 RCC的平均ADC(1.41 x 10(-3)mm(2)/秒+/- 0.61)显着低于(P <.0001)良性病变(2.23 x 10(-3)mm(2) /秒+/- 0.87)在DW成像时,b值分别为0、400和800秒/ mm(2)。在截止ADC小于或等于1.92 x 10(-3)mm(2)/ sec的情况下,ROC曲线(AUC)下的面积,DW成像的灵敏度和特异性用于诊断RCC(不包括血管平滑肌瘤)分别为0.856、86%和80%。 CE MR成像的相应AUC,灵敏度和特异性分别为0.944、100%和89%。结合DW和CE MR成像具有96%的特异性。基于DW成像的实体RCC与肿瘤细胞瘤诊断的AUC为0.854。乳头状细胞癌的ADC低于非乳头状细胞癌。结论:DW成像可用于表征肾脏病变。但是,与CE MR成像相比,它的准确性较低。 DW成像可用于区分实体RCC与肿瘤细胞瘤,并表征RCC的组织学亚型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号