...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Vessel wall damage caused by cerebral protection devices: ex vivo evaluation in porcine carotid arteries.
【24h】

Vessel wall damage caused by cerebral protection devices: ex vivo evaluation in porcine carotid arteries.

机译:脑保护装置引起的血管壁损伤:猪颈动脉的离体评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: To determine the extent of vessel wall damage caused by cerebral protection devices designed for carotid angioplasty by using ex vivo porcine carotid arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The local animal experimentation committee did not require its approval for this study. With a benchtop vascular model (flow rate, 470 mL/min; dicrotic pulsatile flow, 76 pulses per minute; pressure, 115/67 mm Hg [mean pressure, 91 mm Hg]) into which 85 porcine internal carotid arteries (ICAs) were inserted, five different protection devices (Angioguard [Cordis/Johnson & Johnson, Miami, Fla], Filterwire EX [Boston Scientific, Natick, Mass], Trap [Microvena, White Bear Lake, Minn], Neuroshield [Abbott Laboratories, Redwood City, Calif], and Percusurge [Abbott Laboratories]) were evaluated. Adverse movement (1 cm up, 2 cm down, and 1 cm up again) of the activated devices (deployed filters or inflated balloons [Percusurge only]) was simulated, and the device was retrieved. For each of these steps (deployment, movement, retrieval) the amount of debris from the vessel wall in the effluent of the ICA was determined by using a 100-mum filter. The Mann-Whitney test was used to test for differences, and a correction for multiple comparisons was made. P < .05 was considered to indicate a significant difference. The authors attempted to determine whether there was a notable association between the total amount of debris captured and the classification of damage at microscopy. Carotid arteries were analyzed histologically with light and scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: All examined protection devices caused dislodged debris, which was captured in the effluent filter. There were significant differences among the devices in terms of the total amount of debris captured in the filters (lowest amounts of debris, 4.75 mg [Angioguard] and 5.02 mg [Filterwire EX]; highest amount, 7.51 mg [Trap]; P
机译:目的:通过使用离体猪颈动脉来确定由设计用于颈动脉血管成形术的脑保护装置引起的血管壁损伤程度。材料与方法:当地动物实验委员会不需要本研究的批准。使用台式血管模型(流速470 mL / min;重死性搏动流,每分钟76脉动;压力:115/67 mm Hg [平均压力,91 mm Hg]),其中入入85条猪颈内动脉插入的五种不同的保护装置(Angioguard [Cordis / Johnson&Johnson,佛罗里达州迈阿密],Filterwire EX [波士顿科学公司,纳蒂克,马萨诸塞州],陷阱[Microvena,白熊湖,明尼苏达州],Neuroshield [Abbott实验室,红木城,对加州和Percusurge [Abbott实验室]进行了评估。模拟了激活的设备(展开的过滤器或膨胀的气球[仅打击乐])的不利运动(向上1厘米,向下2厘米,再向上1厘米),然后检索了该设备。对于这些步骤中的每个步骤(部署,移动,取回),使用100微米过滤器确定ICA流出物中来自血管壁的碎屑量。曼-惠特尼检验用于检验差异,并对多个比较进行了校正。 P <.05被认为表明存在显着差异。作者试图确定捕获的碎片总量与显微镜下的损伤分类之间是否存在显着关联。用光和扫描电子显微镜对颈动脉进行组织学分析。结果:所有检查过的保护装置均导致碎屑脱落,这些碎屑被收集在废水过滤器中。在过滤器中捕获的碎屑总量方面,设备之间存在显着差异(碎屑的最低含量为4.75 mg [Angioguard]和5.02 mg [Filterwire EX];最高含量为7.51 mg [Trap]; P

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号