...
首页> 外文期刊>Livestock Science >Effects of stall or small group gestation housing on the production, health and behaviour of gilts.
【24h】

Effects of stall or small group gestation housing on the production, health and behaviour of gilts.

机译:档位或小群妊娠房对后备母猪的生产,健康和行为的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The effects of housing gestating gilts in groups of four (G, n=8) or individual stalls (S, n=14) on production, health and behavioural time budget were evaluated. Gilts were allocated to a gestation treatment by d 7 after breeding. They were housed in a single room, floors were fully slatted with no bedding, and all conditions except for housing type were identical. Gilts were weighed and their backfat measured at wk 1 (just after moving to gestation housing), 5, 9 and 13 of pregnancy. After farrowing, litter size, sex ratio, piglet weights and mortality percentages were recorded. Skin lesions were scored using a 6-point scale every 2 wk. Gait was scored using a 6-point scale at the end of gestation. Heart rate was assessed at wk 14 to 15 after breeding. Behaviour was videotaped to collect data on body postures and ingestive behaviour for 24 h at wk 4, 6, 9 and 13 of gestation. Apart from at wk 5, when S gilts had higher backfat than G (P<0.05), G and S gilts did not differ in body weight or backfat during the study. Reproductive performance did not differ. While skin lesion scores did not differ at wk 1, by wk 13 lesion scores for several regions of the head, face, body, feet and legs were higher in G than S animals (P<0.05). There were no differences in heart rate, but gait scores at the end of pregnancy tended to be poorer in G than S gilts (P<0.1). As gestation progressed gilts spent less time standing (P<0.0001) and more time lying (P<0.05), but behavioural time budgets (percentages of time spent standing, lying, sitting, eating and drinking) of animals housed in G and S did not differ. In conclusion, there were few differences detected between gilts housed for one pregnancy in groups of four or stalls. Stalls in this study were relatively spacious, while group pens were relatively small and barren. Effects of gestation housing on sows' welfare may be cumulative, taking several parities to emerge, and care must be taken in the design and management of group housing systems to ensure that they achieve their objective of improved welfare for all group members..
机译:评估了以四个(G,n = 8)或单个摊位(S,n = 14)为一组的母猪后备母猪对生产,健康和行为时间预算的影响。繁殖后第7天,将小母猪分配给妊娠处理。他们被安置在一个房间里,地板完全铺板,没有被褥,除了房屋类型,其他条件都一样。称量母猪的体重,并在怀孕的第5周,第9、13周和第1周(刚移到妊娠房后)测量其后背脂肪。产仔后,记录产仔数,性别比,仔猪体重和死亡率。每2周使用6点量表对皮肤病变进行评分。在妊娠结束时使用6分制对步态进行评分。繁殖后第14至15周评估心率。对行为进行录像,以收集妊娠第4、6、9和13周24小时的身体姿势和摄食行为数据。除了第5周时,当S后备母猪的背脂高于G(P <0.05)时,在研究期间G和S后备母猪的体重或背脂没有差异。生殖性能没有差异。尽管第1周的皮肤病变评分没有差异,但G组的头部,面部,身体,脚和腿的多个区域的第13周病变评分均高于S动物(P <0.05)。心率无差异,但妊娠末的步态得分趋向于比后备母猪差(P <0.1)。随着妊娠的进行,后备母猪的站立时间(P <0.0001)减少,卧床时间(P <0.05)增加,但是行为时间预算(站立,躺着,坐着,进食和喝水的时间百分比)确实降低了。没什么不同。总之,在四个或一组的母猪中,一次怀孕的后备母猪之间几乎没有差异。本研究中的档位相对较宽敞,而组合笔则相对较小且贫瘠。妊娠期住房对母猪福利的影响可能是累积的,要出现几个平衡点,在团体住房系统的设计和管理中必须小心谨慎,以确保其实现为所有团体成员改善福利的目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号