...
首页> 外文期刊>Lung cancer: Journal of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer >Cavitating squamous cell lung carcinoma-distinct entity or not? Analysis of radiologic, histologic, and clinical features.
【24h】

Cavitating squamous cell lung carcinoma-distinct entity or not? Analysis of radiologic, histologic, and clinical features.

机译:空化性鳞状细胞肺癌是否与实体不同?放射学,组织学和临床特征分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Patients with cavitating squamous lung carcinoma (cSLC) are believed to harbor aggressive, chemoresistant disease with distinct features and fare poorly. We retrospectively analyzed radiologic, histologic, and clinical features of patients with cSLC and solid SLC (sSLC) from the patient registry of four Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) cancer centres in an effort to detect distinct characteristics of cSLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 37 cSLC and 212 sSLC patients, most of them male smokers, aged more than 60, treated with resection and/or chemotherapy/radiotherapy were included in the analysis. Disease stage, histologic differentiation and lymphatic/vascular invasion, pre-diagnosis symptoms and their duration, tumor size, site and associated features, metastatic sites, chemotherapy administered, responses and duration as well as time to treatment failure, and overall survival were analyzed for significant differences between the two patient groups. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences (two-sided P < 0.05) in patients with cSLC were found for: locally advanced (IIIB) or metastatic (IV) disease (76.5%) at presentation, longer duration of pre-diagnosis symptoms (mean 10 months), more frequent manifestation of fever, cough, weight loss, poor tumor differentiation, lower lobe primary, absence of atelectasis and satellite lesions. Objective response rates (33% for cSLC versus 32% for sSLC) and response duration (median 6 versus 5 months) were no different in the two patient groups. Median time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were 10 and 13 months for cSLC patients, whereas 12 and 18 months for sSLC patients. Two-year TTF and OS rates were 18.5% and 33.5% for cSLC, while they were 19.3% and 40% for sSLC. No statistically significant differences were observed in any survival curves. CONCLUSION: Patients with cSLC present with high grade tumors that may initially simulate infectious processes, leading to late diagnosis despite long standing symptoms and presentationwith advanced disease. In view of lack of evidence for differential disease course, increased chemoresistance and inferior outcome in comparison to sSLC patients, the definition of cavitating pulmonary carcinoma as a distinct clinical subentity cannot be supported.
机译:引言:空化性鳞状细胞癌(cSLC)患者被认为具有特征性且票价较差的侵袭性,化学耐药性疾病。我们回顾性分析了来自四个希腊合作肿瘤小组(HeCOG)癌症中心的患者登记册中的cSLC和固体SLC(sSLC)患者的放射学,组织学和临床特征,以检测cSLC的独特特征。患者与方法:分析包括37例cSLC和212 sSLC患者,其中大多数是年龄在60岁以上,经切除和/或化学疗法/放射疗法治疗的男性吸烟者。分析疾病的阶段,组织学分化和淋巴/血管浸润,预诊症状及其持续时间,肿瘤大小,部位和相关特征,转移部位,所用化学疗法,反应和持续时间以及治疗失败的时间以及总体生存率两组患者之间存在显着差异。结果:cSLC患者在以下方面具有统计学显着性差异(两侧P <0.05):出现时局部晚期(IIIB)或转移性(IV)疾病(76.5%),诊断前症状持续时间更长(平均10个月) ),发烧,咳嗽,体重减轻,肿瘤分化不良,原发性下叶低,肺不张和附属病变的表现更为频繁。两组患者的客观缓解率(cSLC为33%,sSLC为32%)和缓解持续时间(中位数为6个月对5个月)无差异。 cSLC患者的中位治疗失败时间(TTF)和总生存时间(OS)为10和13个月,而sSLC患者为12和18个月。 cSLC的两年TTF和OS率分别为18.5%和33.5%,而sSLC的两年分别为19.3%和40%。在任何生存曲线中均未观察到统计学显着差异。结论:cSLC患者存在高级别的肿瘤,可能最初模拟感染过程,尽管长期存在症状和表现为晚期疾病,但仍导致晚期诊断。鉴于与sSLC患者相比,差异性疾病病程缺乏证据,化学抗药性增加且预后较差,因此不能支持将空化性肺癌定义为独特的临床实体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号