首页> 外文期刊>Lung cancer: Journal of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer >Phase II study of tamoxifen, ifosfamide, epirubicin and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer failing previous chemotherapy.
【24h】

Phase II study of tamoxifen, ifosfamide, epirubicin and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer failing previous chemotherapy.

机译:他莫昔芬,异环磷酰胺,表柔比星和顺铂联合化疗在先前化疗失败的非小细胞肺癌患者中的II期研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We conducted a phase II study of tamoxifen, ifosfamide, epirubicin, and cisplatin (TIEP) chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had failed previous chemotherapy, in order to assess the response and toxicity of TIEP. Between November 1997 and May 1999, 25 patients were treated. Twelve of the 25 patients (48%) had been previously treated with cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. TIEP doses were tamoxifen 60 mg oral twice daily on days 1-3; ifosfamide 2.4 g/m(2) intravenous infusion (IV) 60 min with mesna on day 2; epirubicin 40 mg/m(2) IV bolus on day 2; and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) IV 60 min on day 2 every 4 weeks for up to six cycles. Seventy one cycles were given to 25 patients, with a median of three cycles (range one to six cycles). All patients were evaluable for toxicity profile and response rate. As expected, the major toxicity was myelosuppression. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 15 patients (60%) during treatment, as well as in 31% of the total courses. Febrile neutropenia occurred in two patients. No toxic death occurred in this study. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in five patients with five cycles. Toxicities other than myelosuppression were few and mild in severity. After two cycles of treatment, five of 25 patients (20%) had a partial response (95% confidence interval 4.3-35.7%). Among 12 patients previously treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy, three patients (25%) achieved a partial response. The median time to disease progression was 4.9 months and median survival was 7.7 months. The response rate and median survival were better than in our previous study of salvage chemotherapy with ifosfamide, 5-FU, and leucovorin; and with ifosfamide, epirubicin, 5-FU, and leucovorin. In conclusion, TIEP appears to be an active combination regimen with an acceptable toxicity profile in Chinese patients with NSCLC who have failed previous chemotherapy.
机译:我们对他莫昔芬,异环磷酰胺,表柔比星和顺铂(TIEP)化疗在先前化疗失败的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中进行了II期研究,以评估TIEP的反应和毒性。在1997年11月至1999年5月之间,共治疗了25例患者。 25名患者中有12名(48%)以前曾接受过基于顺铂的联合化疗。 TIEP剂量是他莫昔芬60 mg,第1-3天每天口服两次;在第2天,用异环磷酰胺2.4 g / m(2)静脉滴注(IV)60分钟;第2天静脉滴注表柔比星40 mg / m(2);和顺铂50 mg / m(2)静脉注射,每2周第2天60分钟,最多六个周期。对25位患者进行了71个疗程,中位数为3个疗程(1到6个疗程)。所有患者的毒性特征和反应率均可评估。如预期的那样,主要毒性是骨髓抑制。在治疗期间,有15例患者(60%)发生了3或4级中性粒细胞减少,占总疗程的31%。 2例患者出现发热性中性粒细胞减少症。在这项研究中没有发生中毒死亡。五个周期为五个周期的患者中发生了3级血小板减少症。除骨髓抑制外,其他毒性很小且轻度。经过两个周期的治疗,25名患者中有5名(20%)出现部分反应(95%置信区间为4.3-35.7%)。在先前接受过基于顺铂化疗的12例患者中,有3例(25%)获得了部分缓解。疾病进展的中位时间为4.9个月,中位生存期为7.7个月。应答率和中位生存期优于我们先前使用异环磷酰胺,5-FU和亚叶酸进行挽救性化疗的研究。以及异环磷酰胺,表柔比星,5-FU和亚叶酸。总而言之,TIEP似乎是一种有效的联合治疗方案,在中国先前接受过化疗失败的NSCLC患者中具有可接受的毒性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号