...
首页> 外文期刊>Lung. >Effect on quality of life of continuous positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a meta-analysis.
【24h】

Effect on quality of life of continuous positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a meta-analysis.

机译:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者持续气道正压通气对生活质量的影响:一项荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). However, the impact of CPAP on quality of life (QOL) is controversial. The aim of this study was to systematically review and determine whether CPAP improves QOL in patients with OSAS. We performed a comprehensive literature search to identify studies published between 1966 and 2007 comparing values of CPAP with control. Weighted mean difference (WMD) was used to analyze the data. The pooled WMD was calculated by using a fixed or random-effect model. The outcomes for 1,256 patients from 16 studies, of whom 656 patients underwent CPAP and 600 were controls, were included. CPAP led to significant improvements in the Nottingham health profile part 2 (WMD=1.657; 95% CI=3.005, -0.308; p=0.016), but there was no difference in other general QOL scores. Patients undergoing CPAP scored better in physical function (WMD=3.457; 95% CI=0.144, 6.771; p=0.041), body pain (WMD=4.017; 95% CI= -0.008, 8.042;p=0.05), energy vitality (WMD=6.984; 95% CI = 0.557, 13.411; p=0.033) and physical component summary (PCS) (WMD=2.040; 95% CI=0.045, 4.035; p=0.045) using the SF-36 tool. This meta-analysis shows that CPAP does not improve general QOL scores but does improve physical domains and vitality. Study design and QOL questionnaire tools are important to capture and evaluate information efficiently. However, generic QOL instruments may not be adequate in detecting important changes in quality of life in patients with OSAS.
机译:持续气道正压通气(CPAP)是阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合症(OSAS)的标准治疗方法。但是,CPAP对生活质量(QOL)的影响是有争议的。这项研究的目的是系统地审查和确定CPAP是否可以改善OSAS患者的QOL。我们进行了全面的文献检索,以鉴定1966年至2007年之间发表的比较CPAP与对照值的研究。加权均数差(WMD)用于分析数据。通过使用固定或随机效应模型计算合并的WMD。包括来自16项研究的1,256例患者的结局,其中656例接受了CPAP,600例为对照。 CPAP显着改善了诺丁汉健康状况第2部分(WMD = 1.657; 95%CI = 3.005,-0.308; p = 0.016),但其他一般QOL评分没有差异。接受CPAP的患者的身体机能(WMD = 3.457; 95%CI = 0.144,6.771; p = 0.041),身体疼痛(WMD = 4.017; 95%CI = -0.008,8.042; p = 0.05),能量活力(使用SF-36工具,WMD = 6.984; 95%CI = 0.557,13.411; p = 0.033)和物理成分摘要(PCS)(WMD = 2.040; 95%CI = 0.045,4.035; p = 0.045)。这项荟萃分析表明,CPAP并不能改善一般QOL评分,但可以改善身体状况和活力。研究设计和QOL问卷工具对于有效捕获和评估信息很重要。但是,普通的QOL仪器可能不足以检测OSAS患者生活质量的重要变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号