...
首页> 外文期刊>Nicotine & Tobacco Research >Evaluating the Effect of Access to Free Medication to Quit Smoking: A Clinical Trial Testing the Role of Motivation
【24h】

Evaluating the Effect of Access to Free Medication to Quit Smoking: A Clinical Trial Testing the Role of Motivation

机译:评估获得免费药物戒烟的效果:一项测试动机作用的临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Although the majority of smokers are ambivalent about quitting, few treatments specifically target smokers lacking motivation to quit in the near future. Most existing interventions are instead predicated on the belief that active treatments should only be distributed to smokers interested in quitting, a largely untested assumption.Methods: In the current clinical trial (N= 157), motivated smokers wanting to quit in the next 30 days were given a 2-week nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) sample and a referral to a quitline (Group MNQ), while unmotivated smokers were randomized to receive the same treatment (Group UNQ) or a quitline referral only (Group UQ). Participants were tracked via telephone for 3 months to assess quitting behaviors and smoking reduction.Results: Groups significantly differed across all comparisons with regard to incidence of any quit attempt (MNQ: 77%, UNQ: 40%, UQ: 18%, p < .05) and any 24-hr quit attempts (62%, 32%, 16%, p < .05). Clinically meaningful differences emerged in the ratesof floating (19%, 17%, 6%) and point prevalence abstinence (17%, 15%, 5%). Compared to participants in Group UQ (11%), a greater proportion of participants in Group MNQ (48%, p = .01) and Group UNQ (31%, p = .01) reduced their daily cigarette consumption by at least half. Proxy measures of cessation readiness (e.g., motivation) favored participants receiving active forms of treatment.Conclusions: Providing NRT samples engaged both motivated and unmotivated smokers into the quitting process and produced positive changes in smoking outcomes. This suggests that motivation should not be considered a necessary precondition to receiving treatment.
机译:简介:尽管大多数吸烟者对戒烟心存疑虑,但很少有针对性的疗法专门针对那些在不久的将来缺乏戒烟动力的吸烟者。相反,大多数现有干预措施均基于以下信念:积极治疗应仅分发给有兴趣戒烟的吸烟者,这在很大程度上未经检验。方法:在当前的临床试验(N = 157)中,有动机的烟民希望在接下来的30天戒烟接受2周尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)样本并转诊至戒烟热线(MNQ组),而无动力吸烟者被随机分配接受相同的治疗(UNQ组)或仅接受戒烟热线转诊(UQ组)。通过电话追踪参与者3个月,以评估戒烟行为和减少吸烟的结果。结果:所有比较中,各组的任何戒烟尝试发生率均存在显着差异(MNQ:77%,UNQ:40%,UQ:18%,p < .05)和任何24小时退出尝试(62%,32%,16%,p <.05)。临床上有意义的差异出现在漂浮率(19%,17%,6%)和点流行戒断率(17%,15%,5%)上。与UQ组的参与者(11%)相比,MNQ组(48%,p = .01)和UNQ组(31%,p = .01)的参与者减少了至少一半的每日卷烟消费量。戒烟准备度(例如动机)的替代指标偏向于接受积极治疗的参与者。结论:提供NRT样本可使有动机和无动机吸烟者参与戒烟过程,并在吸烟结果方面产生积极变化。这表明动机不应被视为接受治疗的必要前提。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号