首页> 外文期刊>Nicotine & Tobacco Research >Cognition and Craving During Smoking Cessation: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study
【24h】

Cognition and Craving During Smoking Cessation: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study

机译:戒烟过程中的认知与渴望:一项生态矩评估研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Some studies using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) have revealed an association between craving for cigarettes and relapse. It is therefore important to understand the correlates of craving during smoking cessation. Attentional bias to smoking cues is a potential correlate of craving, but it has not previously been assessed using EMA during smoking cessation.Methods: Smokers enrolled in a research smoking cessation study were offered the opportunity to take part in an EMA study. Volunteers carried around a personal digital assistant (PDA) for the first week of their quit attempt. They completed up to 4 random assessments (RAs) per day as well as assessments when they experienced a temptation to smoke and when they relapsed. Craving for cigarettes was assessed with a single item (1-7 scale). Attentional bias was assessed with a smoking Stroop task (a reaction time task) at every other assessment, as was self-reported attention to cigarettes.Results: Data were available from 119 participants. Across 882 assessments, participants exhibited a significant smoking Stroop effect. Linear mixed models revealed a significant between-subject association between craving and the smoking Stroop effect.Individuals with higher levels of craving exhibited greater attentional bias. The within-subject association was not significant. Similar results were obtained for the relationship between self-reported attention to cigarettes and attentional bias.Conclusions: Attentional bias can be assessed in the natural environment using EMA during smoking cessation, and attentional bias is a correlate of craving during the early stages of a quit attempt.
机译:简介:一些使用生态瞬时评估(EMA)的研究表明,对香烟的渴望与复发之间存在关联。因此,重要的是要了解戒烟期间渴望的相关性。注意:吸烟提示的偏向性与渴望有关,但以前没有在戒烟期间使用EMA进行过评估。方法:为参加戒烟研究的吸烟者提供了参加EMA研究的机会。志愿者在尝试戒烟的第一周随身携带了一个个人数字助理(PDA)。他们每天完成多达4次随机评估(RA)以及经历吸烟的诱惑和复发时的评估。对香烟的渴望是通过单个项目(1-7比例)进行评估的。在其他每项评估中,吸烟Stroop任务(反应时间任务)均对注意偏见进行了评估,自我报告的卷烟注意力也得到了评估。结果:数据来自119名参与者。在882次评估中,参与者表现出显着的吸烟Stroop效应。线性混合模型显示出渴望与吸烟Stroop效应之间存在显着的主体间联系,渴望程度较高的个体表现出更大的注意力偏见。受试者内部的关联并不显着。结论:可以在自然环境中使用EMA评估戒烟过程中的注意偏向,而注意偏向与戒烟初期的渴望相关。尝试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号