首页> 外文期刊>Nursing inquiry >Deconstructing child and adolescent mental health: questioning the'taken-for-granted'....
【24h】

Deconstructing child and adolescent mental health: questioning the'taken-for-granted'....

机译:破坏儿童和青少年的心理健康:质疑“准予的”……。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Deconstructing child and adolescent mental health: questioning the 'taken-for-granted'... We present a critical deconstructive reading, seeking to problematise 'taken-for-granted' assumptions in child and adolescent mental health (CAMH). The start point for this critical reading is conventional 'history-telling' within CAMH. The aim is not to take issue with the detail in such histories but to critically examine the texts, so as to highlight constructions that structure the presentation of conventional histories and possible purposes that such constructions may serve. The argument is that such conventional histories leave key questions not just unanswered, but unconsidered - a tendency that can be seen throughout the CAMH literature more generally. Therefore, we then pursue critical discussion of how 'taken-for-granted' constructions of CAMH enabled psychiatry to successfully expand its power and influence to establish hegemony over 'problem children'. We do not claim any closure to this critical reading; that is, we do not claim that our critical deconstructive reading is the only reading possible. Similarly, it is not presented in any sense as 'final word'. Rather our hope for this work is that it might stimulate readers to question the 'taken-for-granteds' that we present, and indeed others that they might identify themselves. In so doing, it is our hope that creative dialogue might ensue.
机译:解构儿童和青少年的心理健康:质疑“准予接受” ...我们提出了一个重要的解构性解读,试图对儿童和青少年的心理健康(CAMH)中的“准予”假设进行质疑。批判性阅读的起点是CAMH中的常规“历史记录”。目的不是要对此类历史中的细节提出质疑,而是要严格审查这些文本,以突出显示构成传统历史表示形式的结构以及此类结构可能服务的目的。有观点认为,这样的传统历史不仅悬而未决,而且还没有考虑到关键问题,这一趋势可以在整个CAMH文献中更普遍地看到。因此,我们接下来将进行批判性讨论,即CAMH的“以理所当然”的构造如何使精神病学成功地扩大其力量和影响力,以建立对“问题儿童”的霸权。我们不要求对这一批判性阅读进行任何封闭;就是说,我们并不主张我们的批判性的解构性阅读是唯一可能的阅读。同样,它在任何意义上都不表示为“最终词”。相反,我们对这项工作的希望是,它可能会激发读者质疑我们提出的“被认为是理所当然的东西”,甚至质疑他们可能会认同的其他人。这样做,我们希望可以进行富有创意的对话。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号