首页> 外文期刊>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: Official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions >Comparison of the Boomerang Wire Vascular Access Management System Versus Manual Compression Alone During Percutaneous Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiovascular Procedures: The Boomerang (TM) Wire Vascular Access Management Trial II
【24h】

Comparison of the Boomerang Wire Vascular Access Management System Versus Manual Compression Alone During Percutaneous Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiovascular Procedures: The Boomerang (TM) Wire Vascular Access Management Trial II

机译:Boomerang线血管通路管理系统与手动压缩在经皮诊断和介入性心血管手术过程中的比较:Boomerang(TM)线血管通路管理试验II

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives: To evaluate the use of the Boomerang (TM) Wire as an adjunct to manual compression (MC) in patients requiring diagnostic (Dx) or interventional (Ix) percutaneous procedures. Background: MC remains the standard of care for closure of femoral artery access sites. Adjunctive use of a device to facilitate closure, reduce time to hemostasis (TTH) and ambulation (TTA) without increasing complication rates could reduce costs and hospital resource demands. Methods: The Boomerang (TM) Trial was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing use of the Boomerang (TM) wire, (Cardiva Medical, Sunnyvale, CA) in conjunction with MC versus MC alone to achieve hemostasis in Dx and Ix patients undergoing percutaneous procedures requiring femoral artery access. Endpoints included TTH, TTA, major, and minor access-site related complications. Subjects were randomized 3: 1, Boomerang versus MC. Results: No minor or major device-related adverse events were reported. Nondevice related complication rates were 3 (0.9%) in the Boomerang arm (n=327) and 1 (0.8%) in MC arm (n=123). Mean TTH for Boomerang vs. MC was 11.2 +/- 4.3 vs. 23.2 +/- 11 min for Dx (P<0.0001) and 13.9 +/- 5.4 vs. 38.4 +/- 57.3 min for Ix patients (P<0.0001). Mean TTA for Boomerang vs. MC was 3.3 +/- 3.0 vs. 4.5 +/- 2.0 hr (P<0.0001) for Dx and 5.4 +/- 3.3 vs. 6.8 +/- 3.2 hr (P<0.0001) for Ix patients. Conclusions: Boomerang (TM) use, in conjunction with MC, was associated with low rates of complications and demonstrated that Boomerang (TM) as an adjunct to MC can significantly decrease TTH and TTA after both Dx and Ix procedures. (C) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
机译:目的:评估需要诊断性(Dx)或介入性(Ix)经皮手术的患者使用Boomerang(TM)线作为手动加压(MC)的辅助工具。背景:MC仍然是关闭股动脉进入部位的护理标准。在不增加并发症发生率的情况下辅助使用器械以促进闭合,减少止血时间(TTH)和下床活动(TTA)可以降低成本和医院资源需求。方法:Boomerang(TM)试验是一项前瞻性,多中心,随机对照试验,比较了Boomerang(TM)线(Cardiva Medical,Sunnyvale,CA)与MC或MC单独使用以实现Dx和Ix止血的比较接受经皮手术的患者需要进入股动脉。终点包括TTH,TTA,主要和次要进入部位相关并发症。将受试者随机分为3:1,回旋镖与MC。结果:未报告与轻度或重大器械相关的不良事件。与非装置相关的并发症发生率在Boomerang组(n = 327)为3(0.9%),在MC组(n = 123)为1(0.8%)。 Boomerang与MC的平均TTH分别为11.2 +/- 4.3与Dx的23.2 +/- 11分钟(P <0.0001)和Ix患者的13.9 +/- 5.4与38.4 +/- 57.3分钟(P <0.0001) 。 Boomerang vs.MC的平均TTA对于Dx患者为3.3 +/- 3.0 vs.4.5 +/- 2.0 hr(P <0.0001),对于Ix患者为5.4 +/- 3.3 vs. 6.8 +/- 3.2 hr(P <0.0001) 。结论:Boomerang(TM)与MC结合使用可降低并发症发生率,并证明Boomerang(TM)作为MC的辅助剂可在Dx和Ix手术后显着降低TTH和TTA。 (C)2015年Wiley Periodicals,Inc.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号