首页> 外文期刊>aaps journal >Selection of a Ligand-Binding Neutralizing Antibody Assay for Benralizumab: Comparison with an Antibody-Dependent Cell-Mediated Cytotoxicity (ADCC) Cell-Based Assay
【24h】

Selection of a Ligand-Binding Neutralizing Antibody Assay for Benralizumab: Comparison with an Antibody-Dependent Cell-Mediated Cytotoxicity (ADCC) Cell-Based Assay

机译:贝那利珠单抗配体结合中和抗体检测的选择:与抗体依赖性细胞介导的细胞毒性 (ADCC) 细胞检测的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Assessment of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) for neutralizing activity is important for the clinical development of biopharmaceuticals. Two types of neutralizing antibody (NAb) assays (competitive ligand-binding assay CLBA and cell-based assay CBA) are commonly used to characterize neutralizing activities. To support the clinical development of benralizumab, a humanized, anti-interleukin-5 receptor a, anti-eosinophil monoclonal antibody, we developed and validated a CLBA and a CBA. The CLBA and CBA were compared for sensitivity, drug tolerance, and precision to detect NAbs in serum samples from clinical trials. The CLBA was more sensitive (27.1 and 37.5 ng/mL) than the CBA (1.02 and 1.10 mu g/mL) in detecting NAbs to benralizumab for the polyclonal and monoclonal ADA controls, respectively. With the same polyclonal ADA control, the CLBA detected 250 ng/mL of ADA in the presence of 100 ng/mL of benralizumab, whereas the CBA detected 1.25 ng/mL of ADA in the presence of 780 ng/mL of benralizumab. In 195 ADA-positive samples from 5 studies, 63.59 (124/195) and 16.9 (33/195) were positive for NAb as measured by the CLBA and the CBA, respectively. ADA titers were strongly correlated (Pearson's correlation coefficient r = 0.91; n = 195) with CLBA titers. Moreover, the CLBA titer correlated with CBA percentage inhibition in the CBA-positive samples (Spearman's coefficient r = 0.50; n = 33). Our data demonstrated advantages of the CLBA in various aspects and supported the choice of the CLBA as a NAb assay for the phase III trials.
机译:评估抗药抗体 (ADA) 的中和活性对于生物制药的临床开发非常重要。通常使用两种类型的中和抗体 (NAb) 测定(竞争性配体结合测定 [CLBA] 和基于细胞的测定 [CBA])来表征中和活性。为了支持贝那利珠单抗(一种人源化、抗白细胞介素-5受体a、抗嗜酸性粒细胞)的临床开发,我们开发并验证了CLBA和CBA。比较了 CLBA 和 CBA 检测临床试验血清样本中 NAbs 的灵敏度、耐药性和精密度。CLBA在检测多克隆和单克隆ADA对照的贝那利珠单抗NAb方面分别比CBA(1.02和1.10μ g/mL)更灵敏(27.1和37.5 ng/mL)。使用相同的多克隆 ADA 对照,CLBA 在 100 ng/mL 贝那利珠单抗存在下检测到 250 ng/mL 的 ADA,而 CBA 在 780 ng/mL 贝那利珠单抗存在下检测到 1.25 ng/mL 的 ADA。在 5 项研究的 195 个 ADA 阳性样本中,分别有 63.59% (124/195) 和 16.9% (33/195) 的 NAb 阳性,由 CLBA 和 CBA 测量。ADA滴度与CLBA滴度呈强相关性(Pearson相关系数r = 0.91;n = 195)。此外,在CBA阳性样品中,CLBA滴度与CBA百分比抑制相关(Spearman系数r = 0.50;n = 33)。我们的数据证明了CLBA在各个方面的优势,并支持选择CLBA作为III期试验的NAb检测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号