...
首页> 外文期刊>Nursing philosophy: an international journal for healthcare professionals >Doctor? Who? Nurses, patient's best interests and treatment withdrawal: When no doctor is available, should nurses withdraw treatment from patients?
【24h】

Doctor? Who? Nurses, patient's best interests and treatment withdrawal: When no doctor is available, should nurses withdraw treatment from patients?

机译:医生? WHO?护士,患者的最大利益和撤药:如果没有医生,护士应否撤出患者治疗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Where a decision has been made to stop futile treatment of critically ill patients on an intensive care unit - what is termed withdrawal of treatment in the UK - yet no doctor is available to perform the actions of withdrawal, nurses may be called upon to perform key tasks. In this paper I present two moral justifications for this activity by offering answers to two major questions. One is to ask if it can be in patients' best interests for nurses to be the key actors in withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. The other is to ask if there is any reason that the nursing profession should not undertake such tasks if this is so. Both these questions require the resolution of weighty moral and philosophical issues. Thus, while offering a serious attempt to provide moral justifications for nurses undertaking withdrawal, this paper also invites debate over both the aim of task division between nurses and doctors, and how we might decide what is in the best interests of patients.
机译:如果已决定停止在重症监护病房停止对重症患者的徒劳治疗-在英国被称为撤回治疗-但尚无医生来执行撤回行动,则可能会要求护士进行关键性的治疗任务。在本文中,我将通过回答两个主要问题来为这项活动提供两个道德依据。一种是问护士成为戒断生命维持治疗的关键角色是否符合患者的最大利益。另一个问题是,是否有理由要求护理专业人员不承担此类任务。这两个问题都需要解决重大的道德和哲学问题。因此,在认真尝试为撤职的护士提供道义依据的同时,本文还引发了关于护士和医生之间任务分配的目的以及我们如何决定最符合患者最大利益的辩论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号