...
首页> 外文期刊>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: Official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions >Rheolityc Thrombectomy in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Effect on Microvascular Obstruction, Infarct Size, and Left Ventricular Remodeling
【24h】

Rheolityc Thrombectomy in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Effect on Microvascular Obstruction, Infarct Size, and Left Ventricular Remodeling

机译:在急性心肌梗死中进行流变血栓切除术:对微血管阻塞,梗死面积和左心室重塑的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives: We sought to analyze whether rheolytic thrombectomy (RT) in comparison with manual thrombus aspiration (MTA) may reduce microvascular obstruction (MVO), infarct size (IS), and left ventricular (LV) remodeling in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Background: Conflicting results have been reported as to whether MTA reduces MVO and IS. Methods and Results: Eighty STEMI reperfused by primary angioplasty and abciximab were randomly allocated (1: 1) to RT or MTA. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in 37 patients (19 RT) and after 1 year in 19 (9 RT); baseline, 1- and 6-month 2D-echo was performed in all patients. MVO and IS were measured 8 min after gadolinium injection with late enhancement sequences and were analyzed quantitatively at a core laboratory blinded to randomization. At baseline TIMI thrombus grade were similar (RT: 4.47 +/- 0.84 vs. MTA: 4.67 +/- 0.76, P=0.453). After thrombectomy, thrombus grade decreased to 1.11 +/- 1.04 in RT vs. 2.17 +/- 1.29 in MTA arm (P=0.009). RT compared with MTA did not reduced significantly myocardial IS [12.2% (6.4-22.1) vs. 19.0% (7-28.5), P=0.224] as well as the extent of MVO [0.0% (0.0-0.17) vs. 0.6% (0.0-1.4), P=0.117], but a trend toward a lower incidence of MVO (16% vs. 44%, P=0.056) and a less LV remodeling rate were found in RT arm (11% vs. 24%, P < 0.140). Conclusion: RT in comparison with MTA was more effective in thrombus removal, but it did not reduced significantly the IS and the extent of MVO. However, a trend toward a lower incidence of MVO and a better preservation of LV volumes were found in RT arm. (C) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
机译:目的:我们试图分析溶血性血栓切除术(RT)与手动血栓抽吸术(MTA)相比是否可以减少ST抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)中的微血管阻塞(MVO),梗死面积(IS)和左心室(LV)重塑)。背景:关于MTA是否降低MVO和IS的报道相互矛盾。方法和结果:80例经原发性血管成形术和阿昔单抗再灌注的STEMI被随机分配(1:1)用于RT或MTA。 37例患者(19例)进行了心脏磁共振成像(MRI),而19例患者中的19年(9例)进行了1年;在所有患者中进行基线,1个月和6个月的2D回声。 g注射后8分钟用晚期增强序列测量MVO和IS,并在不愿进行随机分组的核心实验室进行定量分析。在基线TIMI时血栓等级相似(RT:4.47 +/- 0.84,而MTA:4.67 +/- 0.76,P = 0.453)。血栓切除术后,RT的血栓等级降至1.11 +/- 1.04,而MTA的血栓等级降至2.17 +/- 1.29(P = 0.009)。与MTA相比,RT并未显着降低心肌IS [12.2%(6.4-22.1)对19.0%(7-28.5),P = 0.224]以及MVO的程度[0.0%(0.0-0.17)对0.6 %(0.0-1.4),P = 0.117],但在RT臂中发现MVO发生率较低的趋势(16%vs. 44%,P = 0.056)和LV重塑率较低(11%vs. 24) %,P <0.140)。结论:与MTA相比,RT在血栓清除方面更有效,但并没有显着降低IS和MVO程度。然而,在RT组中发现了MVO发生率降低和LV体积更好保存的趋势。 (C)2015年Wiley Periodicals,Inc.

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号