首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Medicine Communications >The value of early and double phase 99Tcm-sestamibi scintimammography in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
【24h】

The value of early and double phase 99Tcm-sestamibi scintimammography in the diagnosis of breast cancer.

机译:早期和双相99Tcm-Sestamibi闪烁X线摄片在乳腺癌诊断中的价值。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to assess the additional value of early and double phase scintimammography (SMM) with 99Tcm-sestamibi in the detection of breast cancer following initial evaluation by palpation and mammography. Altogether, 322 women with breast lesions evaluated prospectively by palpation, fine-needle aspiration and mammography were assigned a malignancy risk according to the results. Scintimammography was performed in all patients in the prone breast dependent position. Immediate and delayed views were obtained. Acquisition of immediate tracer uptake was termed 'early phase' SMM, whereas a combination of both immediate and delayed phase images was termed 'double phase' SMM. All patients underwent breast biopsy. Both early phase and double phase SMM detected eight of nine tumours in the low-risk group (88.8% sensitivity). In the uncertain cases (moderate-risk group), early phase SMM detected all malignant tumours, but double phase SMM missed one (92.3% sensitivity). In the high-risk group, early phase SMM missed two breast cancers (94.6% sensitivity) and double phase SMM missed four (89.2% sensitivity). Overall, early phase SMM had a sensitivity of 94.9% and a specificity of 80.2% in detecting breast cancer, whereas double phase SMM had a sensitivity of 89.8% and a specificity of 94.3%. Both methods had 100% sensitivity for tumours larger than 1 cm. In conclusion, SMM detected additional breast cancers following an initial evaluation by palpation, fine-needle aspiration and mammography. Our results suggest that double phase SMM is more specific than early phase SMM, although early phase SMM is more sensitive. Whether the interpretation of SMM results should rely on both early and delayed images, or early images alone, should be based on the relative risk of malignancy of the breast lesion as estimated by the initial evaluation.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估触诊和乳腺X线摄影初步评估后,早期和双相闪烁X线摄影术(SMM)与99Tcm-西他米比在乳腺癌检测中的附加价值。根据结果​​,通过触诊,细针穿刺和乳腺X线摄影术对322例乳腺癌患者进行了前瞻性评估。在俯卧的乳房依赖位置的所有患者中均进行了闪烁X线照相术。立即和延迟的意见。立即示踪剂摄取的采集称为“早期” SMM,而即时和延迟相图像的组合称为“双相” SMM。所有患者均行乳房活检。在低风险组中,早期阶段和双重阶段SMM均可检测到9个肿瘤中的8个(敏感性为88.8%)。在不确定的情况下(中度风险组),早期SMM可检测到所有恶性肿瘤,但双期SMM漏诊了一个(92.3%的敏感性)。在高风险组中,早期SMM错过了两次乳腺癌(敏感性为94.6%),双阶段SMM错过了四个乳腺癌(敏感性为89.2%)。总体而言,早期SMM在检测乳腺癌中的敏感性为94.9%,特异性为80.2%,而双相SMM在检测乳腺癌中的敏感性为89.8%,特异性为94.3%。两种方法对大于1 cm的肿瘤都具有100%的敏感性。总之,在通过触诊,细针穿刺和乳房X线摄影术进行初步评估后,SMM检测到了其他乳腺癌。我们的结果表明,尽管早期SMM更敏感,但双阶段SMM比早期SMM更具有特异性。 SMM结果的解释是应该依靠早期图像还是延迟图像,还是仅依靠早期图像,应基于初步评估所估计的乳腺病变恶性相对风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号