首页> 外文期刊>Nursing & health sciences >Antibacterial effects on dry-fast and traditional water-based surgical scrubbing methods: A two-time points experimental study
【24h】

Antibacterial effects on dry-fast and traditional water-based surgical scrubbing methods: A two-time points experimental study

机译:对速干和传统水基手术擦洗方法的抗菌作用:两点实验研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study determined the in-use effects of dry-fast and traditional hand-washing surgical scrubs among operating room staff members. This is a static group comparison study with purposive sampling. A total of 156 staff members were recruited in an operating room in a medical center located in southern Taiwan. The participants were divided into traditional and dry-fast hand-washing groups. Microbial counts were measured right after the two groups finished surgical scrubbing and at the completion of surgery. The results showed that the use of dry-fast antisepsis has a better persistent effect (P=0.001), more nurses chose dry-fast antisepsis than surgeons (P=0.012), and the post-operation number of colonies for nurses was significantly higher than that for surgeons (P=0.003). Operating room nurses are long-term and frequent users of antibacterial agents, and their requirement of skin protection is higher. The dry-fast technique has the advantage of being less irritating to the skin and less time consuming; therefore, brush-free and dry-fast antisepsis is recommended.
机译:这项研究确定了手术室工作人员使用速干和传统手洗手术磨砂膏的使用效果。这是一项有目的抽样的静态小组比较研究。在台湾南部医疗中心的一间手术室中,总共招募了156名工作人员。参加者分为传统洗手组和干洗手组。在两组完成手术擦洗后和手术结束后立即测量微生物计数。结果表明,使用速干防腐效果更好(P = 0.001),比起外科医生,更多的护士选择速干防腐(P = 0.012),且护士术后菌落数量明显更高。比外科医生要高(P = 0.003)。手术室护士是抗菌剂的长期使用者,他们对皮肤的保护要求更高。快干技术的优点是对皮肤的刺激较小,并且耗时少。因此,建议使用无刷和快速干燥的防腐剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号