首页> 外文期刊>Nurse education today >A systematic review of selected evidence on developing nursing students' critical thinking through problem-based learning.
【24h】

A systematic review of selected evidence on developing nursing students' critical thinking through problem-based learning.

机译:对通过基于问题的学习发展护理学生的批判性思维的选定证据的系统综述。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Rapidly changing developments and expanding roles in healthcare environment requires professional nurses to develop critical thinking. Nursing education strives to facilitate students' critical thinking through the appropriate instructional approaches. Problem-based learning (PBL) is a student-centered approach to learning which enables the students to work cooperatively in small groups for seeking solutions to situations/problems. The systematic review was conducted to provide the available evidence on developing nursing students' critical thinking through PBL. The computerized searches from 1990-2006 in CINAHL, Proquest, Cochrane library, Pubmed etc were performed. All studies which addressed the differences in critical thinking among nursing students in PBL were considered. Two independent reviewers assessed the eligibility of each study, its level of evidence and the methodological quality. As a result, only ten studies were retrieved, they were: one RCT with a Jadad quality score of 3, one nonrandomized control study, two quasi-experimental studies with non-controlled pretest-posttest design, and six descriptive studies. The available evidence in this review did not provide supportive evidence on developing nursing students' critical thinking through PBL. Clearly, there is a need for additional research with larger sample size and high quality to clarify the effects of PBL on critical thinking development within nursing educational context.
机译:快速变化的发展和在医疗保健环境中角色的扩展要求专业护士发展批判性思维。护理教育通过适当的教学方法努力促进学生的批判性思维。基于问题的学习(PBL)是一种以学生为中心的学习方法,它使学生能够以小组形式进行合作,以寻求针对情况/问题的解决方案。进行了系统的审查,以提供有关通过PBL培养护理学生的批判性思维的可用证据。在1990年至2006年间,对CINAHL,Proquest,Cochrane图书馆,Pubmed等进行了计算机搜索。考虑了所有解决PBL护理专业学生批判性思维差异的研究。两名独立的评审人员评估了每项研究的资格,证据水平和方法学质量。结果,仅检索到十项研究,它们是:一项Jadad质量得分为3的RCT,一项非随机对照研究,两项非对照前测试-后测试设计的准实验研究以及六项描述性研究。这篇综述中的现有证据并未为通过PBL培养护理学生的批判性思维提供支持性证据。显然,有必要进行更多具有更大样本量和更高质量的研究,以阐明PBL对护理教育背景下批判性思维发展的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号