首页> 外文OA文献 >Efficacy of teaching methods used to develop critical thinking in nursing and midwifery undergraduate students: A systematic review of the literature
【2h】

Efficacy of teaching methods used to develop critical thinking in nursing and midwifery undergraduate students: A systematic review of the literature

机译:在护理和助产士学生中发展批判性思维的教学方法的有效性:文献系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: The value and importance of incorporating strategies that promote critical thinking in nursing andmidwifery undergraduate programmes are well documented. However, relatively little is known about theeffectiveness of teaching strategies in promoting CT. Evaluating effectiveness is important to promote ‘bestpractise’ in teaching.Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of teaching methods used to develop critical thinking skills in nursing andmidwifery undergraduate students.Data Sources: The following six databases; CINAHL, Ovid Medline, ERIC, Informit, PsycINFO and Scopus weresearched and resulted in the retrieval of 1315 papers.Review Methods: After screening for inclusion, each paper was evaluated using the Critical Appraisal SkillsProgramme tool. Twenty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria and quality appraisal.Results: Twelve different teaching interventions were tested in 8 countries. Results varied, with little consistencyacross studies using the same type of intervention or outcome tool. Sixteen tools were used to measure the effi-cacy of teaching in developing critical thinking. Seventeen studies identified a significant increase in criticalthinking, while nine studies found no increases, and two found unexplained decreases in CT when using a similareducational intervention.Conclusions: Whilst this review aimed to identify effective teaching strategies that promote and develop criticalthinking, flaws in methodology and outcome measures contributed to inconsistent findings. The continued use ofgeneralised CT tools is unlikely to help identify appropriate teaching methods that will improve CT abilities ofmidwifery and nursing students and prepare them for practise. The review was limited to empirical studies publishedin English that used measures of critical thinking with midwifery and nursing students. Discipline specificstrategies and tools that measure students' abilities to apply CT in practise are needed.
机译:背景:在护理和助产士本科课程中纳入能促进批判性思维的策略的价值和重要性已得到充分证明。但是,对于促进CT的教学策略的有效性知之甚少。评估效果对促进教学中的“最佳实践”很重要。目的:评估用于发展护理和助产士本科生批判性思维技能的教学方法的效果。数据来源:以下六个数据库;检索了CINAHL,Ovid Medline,ERIC,Informit,PsycINFO和Scopus,检索了1315篇论文。审查方法:筛选纳入后,使用关键评估技能程序工具对每篇论文进行评估。结果28项研究符合入选标准和质量评估。结果:在8个国家测试了12种不同的教学干预措施。结果差异很大,使用相同类型的干预或结果工具的研究几乎没有一致性。使用了十六种工具来衡量教学在发展批判性思维中的效率。十七项研究发现批判性思维显着增加,而九项研究发现使用类似的教育干预措施时,CT并未增加,而两项发现无法解释的CT下降。结果测量导致不一致的发现。继续使用通用的CT工具不太可能帮助确定合适的教学方法,这些方法将提高助产士和护理学生的CT能力并为他们的实践做好准备。该评论仅限于英语发表的实证研究,该实证研究对助产士和护理学学生进行了批判性思考。需要用于衡量学生在实践中应用CT的能力的学科特定策略和工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号