首页> 外文期刊>Nurse education today >Academic freedom, analysis, and the Code of Professional Conduct.
【24h】

Academic freedom, analysis, and the Code of Professional Conduct.

机译:学术自由,分析和《职业行为守则》。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Despite nursing's move into higher education, academic freedom has received little attention within the literature. After discussing the concept of academic freedom, this paper argues that there is a potential tension between academic freedom and the requirement to educate student nurses who are fit for practice. One way in which this tension might be revealed is in the marking of student assignments. We ask the question - how should nurse educators mark an essay which is sufficiently analytical but reaches moral conclusions that lie outside the Code of Professional Conduct? We argue that despite an understandable temptation to penalise such an essay, invoking the Code of Professional Conduct to do so, no penalty should be applied, and academic freedom for students within higher education should be encouraged. This is because first, academic freedom is a good in itself especially as it allows unconventional and unpalatable conclusions to be discussed and rebutted, and second, applying a penalty on these grounds is necessarily inconsistent.
机译:尽管护理学转向了高等教育,但是学术自由在文献中却很少受到关注。在讨论了学术自由的概念之后,本文认为,学术自由与对适合实践的学生护士进行教育的要求之间存在潜在的紧张关系。可以显示这种压力的一种方法是标记学生的作业。我们问一个问题-护士教育者应如何标记一篇具有足够分析性但得出道德结论不属于《专业行为守则》的论文?我们认为,尽管有这样一种诱人的诱惑,那就是对这种文章进行处罚,但同时引用了《专业行为守则》,却不应施加任何处罚,并且应该鼓励高等教育中的学生自由学习。这是因为,首先,学术自由本身就是一件好事,特别是因为它允许讨论和反驳非常规和令人不适的结论,其次,基于这些理由施加惩罚必然是不一致的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号