首页> 外文期刊>Neurosurgery >Minimal access nerve surgery and interventional magnetic resonance imaging.
【24h】

Minimal access nerve surgery and interventional magnetic resonance imaging.

机译:最少的神经外科手术和介入性磁共振成像。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Develop and assess the utility of novel minimal access techniques including percutaneous open-configuration interventional magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI), open surgery using open or closed/cylindrical iMRI systems, and minimal access open surgery with electromyographic guidance in a standard operating room. METHODS: For more than 2500 percutaneous open iMRI procedures, 25 incisional surgery open iMRI cases, 3 incisional surgery closed/cylindrical iMRI cases, 25 computed tomography-guided percutaneous procedures, and more than 1000 minimal access incisional surgery cases in the standard operating room with electromyographic guidance, cycle time for intraoperative data collection and numbers of guidance events per case were assessed. RESULTS: Cycle time varied greatly. The minimum was for open surgery in the standard operating room with direct nerve stimulation for electromyography, requiring 10 to 15 seconds, which was applicable for dozens of assessments during the surgery and had negligible effects on total surgical time. Percutaneous procedures in the open iMRI environment allowed for 20 or 30 imaging events during a procedure, with cycle times of between 10 and 20 seconds. Incisional surgery in the open iMRI system had a cycle time of about 1 to 5 minutes for "in-magnet" procedures and about 5 to 10 minutes for "magnet-adjacent" procedures. Incisional surgery in closed/cylindrical iMRI procedures had a cycle time of 45 to 60 minutes, and the technique proved awkward to use more than once or twice per surgical case. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous open-configuration iMRI provides clear benefits over computed tomography or ultrasound. Minimal access surgery and incisional open-configuration iMRI are useful and effective in some situations. Closed/cylindrical iMRI systems pose challenges for patient safety, add greatly to surgical time, and provide limited useful intraoperative benefits.
机译:目的:开发和评估新颖的最小通路技术的实用性,包括经皮开放式介入磁共振成像(iMRI),使用开放或闭合/圆柱形iMRI系统的开放手术以及在标准手术室中以肌电图引导进行的最小通路开放手术。方法:对于标准手术室中的2500例经皮开放iMRI手术,25例切开手术iMRI病例,3例封闭/圆柱iMRI切开手术,25台断层摄影术指导的经皮手术以及1000例以上的最小手术切开手术评估肌电图指导,术中数据收集的周期时间和每例指导事件的数量。结果:周期时间差异很大。最低要求是在标准手术室进行直接肌电刺激的开放式手术,需要10至15秒,这适用于手术期间的数十次评估,并且对总手术时间的影响可忽略不计。开放式iMRI环境中的经皮手术允许在手术过程中进行20或30次成像事件,周期时间在10至20秒之间。在开放式iMRI系统中,切口手术的“磁铁中”手术周期时间约为1至5分钟,“磁铁相邻”手术的周期时间约为5至10分钟。在封闭/圆柱形iMRI程序中进行切开手术的周期时间为45至60分钟,事实证明该技术在每个手术病例中使用不止一次或两次是不方便的。结论:经皮开放配置iMRI优于计算机断层扫描或超声检查。在某些情况下,微创手术和切开开放式iMRI是有用且有效的。封闭式/圆柱形iMRI系统对患者的安全性提出了挑战,极大地增加了手术时间,并且在术中获益有限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号