首页> 外文期刊>Neuroscience: An International Journal under the Editorial Direction of IBRO >Cerebellar stroke without motor deficit: clinical evidence for motor and non-motor domains within the human cerebellum.
【24h】

Cerebellar stroke without motor deficit: clinical evidence for motor and non-motor domains within the human cerebellum.

机译:无运动功能障碍的小脑中风:人类小脑内运动和非运动区域的临床证据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there are non-motor regions of cerebellum in which sizeable infarcts have little or no impact on motor control. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES: We evaluated motor deficits in patients following cerebellar stroke using a modified version of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (MICARS). Lesion location was determined using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computerized axial tomography (CT). Patients were grouped by stroke location-Group I, stroke within the anterior lobe (lobules I-V); Group 2, anterior lobe and lobule VI; Group 3, posterior lobe (lobules VI-IX; including flocculonodular lobe, lobule X); Group 4, posterior lobe but excluding lobule VI (i.e. lobules VII-X); Group 5, stroke within anterior lobe plus posterior lobe. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were examined 8.0+/-6.0 days following stroke. There were no Group 1 patients. As mean MICARS scores for Groups 2 through 5 differed significantly (one-way analysis of variance, F(3,35)=10.9, P=0.000 03), post hoc Tukey's least significant difference tests were used to compare individual groups. Group 2 MICARS scores (n=6; mean+/-SD, 20.2+/-6.9) differed from Group 3 (n=6; 7.2+/-3.8; P=0.01) and Group 4 (n=13; 2.5+/-2.0; P=0.000 02); Group 5 (n=14; 18.6+/-12.8) also differed from Group 3 (P=0.009) and Group 4 (P=0.000 02). There were no differences between Groups 2 and 5 (P=0.71), or between Group 3 and Group 4 (P=0.273). However, Group 3 differed from Group 4 when analyzed with a two-sample t-test unadjusted for multiple comparisons (P=0.03). Thus, the cerebellar motor syndrome resulted from stroke in the anterior lobe, but not from stroke in lobules VII-X (Groups 2 plus 5, n=20, MICARS 19.1+/-11.2, vs. Group 4; P=0.000 002). Strokes involving lobule VI produced minimal motor impairment. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that cerebellar stroke does not always result in motor impairment, and they provide clinical evidence for topographic organization of motor versus nonmotor functions in the human cerebellum.
机译:目的:确定是否存在小脑的非运动区域,在该区域中较大的梗塞对运动控制影响很小或没有影响。实验程序:我们使用国际合作共济失调评定量表(MICARS)的修订版评估了小脑卒中后患者的运动功能障碍。使用磁共振成像(MRI)和计算机轴向断层扫描(CT)确定病变位置。将患者按中风部位分组-I组,前叶内中风(I-V小叶);第2组,前叶和小叶VI;第3组,后叶(VI-IX小叶;包括絮状小叶,X小叶);第4组,后叶,但不包括小叶VI(即小叶VII-X);第5组,前叶加后叶内的中风。结果:39名患者在卒中后8.0 +/- 6.0天接受了检查。没有第1组患者。由于第2组到第5组的平均MICARS得分存在显着差异(单因素方差分析,F(3,35)= 10.9,P = 0.000 03),因此采用了Tukey的最低显着性差异检验来比较各个组。第2组MICARS得分(n = 6;平均值+/- SD,20.2 +/- 6.9)与第3组(n = 6; 7.2 +/- 3.8; P = 0.01)和第4组(n = 13; 2.5 + / -2.0; P = 0.000 02);第5组(n = 14; 18.6 +/- 12.8)也不同于第3组(P = 0.009)和第4组(P = 0.000 02)。第2组和第5组之间(P = 0.71)或第3组和第4组之间(P = 0.273)没有差异。但是,第3组与第4组不同,当使用未经两次校正的两样本t检验进行分析时(P = 0.03)。因此,小脑运动综合征是由前叶中风引起的,而不是由小叶VII-X中风引起的(第2加5组,n = 20,MICARS 19.1 +/- 11.2,第4组; P = 0.000 002) 。涉及小叶VI的中风产生最小的运动损伤。结论:这些发现表明小脑中风并不总是导致运动障碍,并且它们为人小脑的运动与非运动功能的地形组织提供了临床证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号