首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychology >Factor Structure of Cognition and Functional Capacity in Two Studies of Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder: Implications for Genomic Studies
【24h】

Factor Structure of Cognition and Functional Capacity in Two Studies of Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder: Implications for Genomic Studies

机译:精神分裂症和双相情感障碍的两项研究的认知和功能能力的因子结构:对基因组学研究的意义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective: Impairments in cognition and everyday functioning are common in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder (BPD). In this article, we present factor analyses of cognitive and functional capacity (FC) measures based on 2 studies of schizophrenia (SCZ) and bipolar I disorder (BPI) using similar methods. The overall goal of these analyses was to determine whether performance-based assessments should be examined individually, or aggregated on the basis of the correlational structure of the tests, as well as to evaluate the similarity of factor structures of SCZ and BPI. Method: Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Study #572 (Harvey et al., 2014) evaluated cognitive and FC measures among 5,414 BPI and 3,942 SCZ patients. A 2nd study evaluated similar neuropsychological (NP) and FC measures among 368 BPI and 436 SCZ patients. Principal components analysis, as well as exploratory and CFAs, were used to examine the data. Results: Analyses in both datasets suggested that NP and FC measures were explained by a single underlying factor in BPI and SCZ patients, both when analyzed separately or as in a combined sample. The factor structure in both studies was similar, with or without inclusion of FC measures; homogeneous loadings were observed for that single factor across cognitive and FC domains across the samples. Conclusion: The empirically derived factor model suggests that NP performance and FC are best explained as a single latent trait applicable to people with SCZ and BPD. This single measure may enhance the robustness of the analyses relating genomic data to performance-based phenotypes.
机译:目的:精神分裂症和双相情感障碍(BPD)常见于认知和日常功能障碍。在本文中,我们基于对精神分裂症(SCZ)和双相性I型障碍(BPI)的两项研究,使用相似的方法,对认知和功能能力(FC)措施进行因子分析。这些分析的总体目标是确定是否应单独检查基于绩效的评估,还是应基于测试的相关结构汇总这些绩效,以及评估SCZ和BPI的因素结构的相似性。方法:退伍军人事务合作研究计划研究#572(Harvey等人,2014)评估了5,414名BPI和3,942名SCZ患者的认知和FC措施。第二项研究评估了368名BPI和436名SCZ患者中类似的神经心理学(NP)和FC措施。主成分分析,以及探索性和CFA用于检查数据。结果:两个数据集中的分析均表明,无论是单独分析还是组合样本分析,NP和FC测量值均由BPI和SCZ患者的单个潜在因素解释。两项研究的因素结构相似,有无FC措施都没有。在整个样本的认知域和FC域中均观察到该单一因子的均质负载。结论:根据经验得出的因子模型表明,NP表现和FC最好被解释为适用于SCZ和BPD患者的单个潜在特征。该单一措施可以增强将基因组数据与基于性能的表型相关的分析的稳健性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号