首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychologia >Hemispheric asymmetries in discourse processing: evidence from false memories for lists and texts.
【24h】

Hemispheric asymmetries in discourse processing: evidence from false memories for lists and texts.

机译:话语处理中的半球不对称:来自列表和文本错误记忆的证据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Previous research suggests that the right hemisphere (RH) may contribute uniquely to discourse and text processing by activating and maintaining a wide range of meanings, including more distantly related meanings. The present study used the word-lists false memory paradigm [Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803-814.] to examine the hypothesis that difference between the two cerebral hemispheres in discourse processing may be due, at least partly, to memory representations for implicit text-related semantic information. Specifically, we tested the susceptibility of the left hemisphere (LH) and RH to unpresented target words following the presentation of semantically related words appearing in either word lists or short texts. Findings showed that the RH produced more false alarms than the LH for unpresented target words following either word lists or texts. These findings reveal hemispheric differences in memory for semantically related information and suggest that RH advantage in long-term maintenance of a wide range of text-related word meanings may be one aspect of its unique contribution to the construction of a discourse model. The results support the RH coarse semantic coding theory [Beeman, M. (1998). Coarse semantic coding and discourse comprehension. In M. Beeman & C. Chiarello (Eds.), Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (pp. 255-284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.] and suggest that hemispheric differences in semantic processing during language comprehension extend also to verbal memory.
机译:先前的研究表明,右半球(RH)通过激活和保持广泛的意义(包括更遥远相关的意义),可能对话语和文本处理做出独特的贡献。本研究使用单词表错误记忆范例[Roediger,H. L.,III,&McDermott,K. B.(1995)。创建错误的记忆:记住列表中未出现的单词。实验心理学杂志:学习,记忆和认知,21,803-814。]检验以下假设:两个大脑半球之间在语篇处理中的差异可能至少部分是由于与隐式文本相关的语义的记忆表示所致信息。具体来说,我们测试了出现在单词列表或短文本中的语义相关单词的呈现之后,左半球(LH)和RH对未呈现的目标单词的敏感性。研究结果表明,对于单词列表或文本之后未显示的目标单词,相对于LH,RH产生的误报更多。这些发现揭示了语义相关信息在记忆上的半球差异,并表明在长期维护各种与文本相关的词义中,RH的优势可能是其对构建话语模型的独特贡献之一。结果支持RH粗略语义编码理论[Beeman,M.(1998)。粗略的语义编码和话语理解。在M. Beeman&C. Chiarello(编辑)中,“右半球语言理解:来自认知神经科学的观点”(第255-284页)。 [Mahwah,NJ:Erlbaum。],并建议在语言理解过程中语义处理中的半球差异也扩展到语言记忆。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号