...
首页> 外文期刊>NeuroImage >Differential selectivity for dynamic versus static information in face-selective cortical regions.
【24h】

Differential selectivity for dynamic versus static information in face-selective cortical regions.

机译:脸部选择性皮质区域中动态信息与静态信息的差分选择性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Neuroimaging studies have identified multiple face-selective regions in human cortex but the functional division of labor between these regions is not yet clear. A central hypothesis, with some empirical support, is that face-selective regions in the superior temporal sulcus (STS) are particularly responsive to dynamic information in faces, whereas the fusiform face area (FFA) computes the static or invariant properties of faces. Here we directly tested this hypothesis by measuring the magnitude of response in each region to both dynamic and static stimuli. Consistent with the hypothesis, we found that the response to movies of faces was not significantly different from the response to static images of faces from these same movies in the right FFA and right occipital face area (OFA). By contrast the face-selective region in the right posterior STS (pSTS) responded nearly three times as strongly to dynamic faces as to static faces, and a face-selective region in the right anterior STS (aSTS) responded to dynamic faces only. Both of these regions also responded more strongly to moving faces than to moving bodies, indicating that they are preferentially engaged in processing dynamic information from faces, not in more general processing of any dynamic social stimuli. The response to dynamic and static faces was not significantly different in a third face-selective region in the posterior continuation of the STS (pcSTS). The strong selectivity of face-selective regions in the pSTS and aSTS, but not the FFA, OFA or pcSTS, for dynamic face information demonstrates a clear functional dissociation between different face-selective regions, and provides further clues into their function.
机译:神经影像学研究已经确定了人类皮质中的多个面部选择性区域,但是这些区域之间的功能分工尚不明确。有一些经验支持的中心假设是,上颞沟(STS)中的脸部选择区域对脸部中的动态信息特别敏感,而梭形脸部区域(FFA)计算脸部的静态或不变特性。在这里,我们通过测量每个区域对动态和静态刺激的响应幅度来直接检验该假设。与该假设一致,我们发现在FFA和右枕面部区域(OFA)中,对这些相同电影的脸部静态图像的响应与对静态图像的响应没有显着差异。相比之下,右后STS(pSTS)中的脸部选择性区域对动态面部的响应是静态面部的三倍,而右前STS(aSTS)中的脸部选择性区域仅对动态面部的响应。这两个区域对移动的面孔的反应也比对移动的身体的反应更为强烈,这表明它们优先参与处理来自面孔的动态信息,而不是更一般地处理任何动态的社会刺激。在STS后部连续术(pcSTS)的第三个面部选择区域中,对动态和静态面部的响应没有显着差异。 pSTS和aSTS中的脸部选择性区域对FFA,OFA或pcSTS的强选择性对动态脸部信息显示出明显的功能分离,这为不同的脸部选择性区域提供了清晰的功能,并为其功能提供了更多线索。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号