...
首页> 外文期刊>Neuroepidemiology >Methods in Neuroepidemiology Characterization of European Longitudinal Cohort Studies in Parkinson's Disease - Report of the JPND Working Group BioLoC-PD
【24h】

Methods in Neuroepidemiology Characterization of European Longitudinal Cohort Studies in Parkinson's Disease - Report of the JPND Working Group BioLoC-PD

机译:欧洲纵向队列研究帕金森氏病的神经流行病学表征方法-JPND工作组BioLoC-PD报告

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Enormous effort is being put into the identification and characterization of symptoms that may be used as predictive and progression markers in Parkinson's disease (PD). An impressive number of PD patients and individuals at risk for or in the prodromal stage of PD are currently followed in longitudinal studies; however, there does not exist an overview on the kind of markers evaluated and the assessments used. Methods: Information on the design, sample size, evaluated markers and assessments of 21 studies of the Joint Programme - Neurodegenerative Disease Research BioLoC-PD working group were collected by questionnaire. The studies were classified into at risk/prodromal or clinical PD cohorts. The assessments were grouped into quantitative assessments, investigator-rated assessments, investigator inter-views, patient-rated questionnaires and caregiver-rated questionnaires. Results: Compilation of these data revealed an interesting consensus on evaluated markers, but there was an enormous variability of assessments. Furthermore, there is a remarkable similarity in the markers assessed and evaluation methods applied in the risk/prodromal and clinical PD cohorts. Conclusions: The inventory of the longitudinal cohorts that are part of the BioLoC-PD consortium reveals that there is a growing consensus on the markers that should be assessed in longitudinal cohort studies in PD. However, controversy still exists on the specific type of assessment. To allow comparison of data and common analyses it will be essential to harmonize scales and assessment outcomes. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:背景:正在大力努力地鉴定和表征症状,这些症状可用作帕金森氏病(PD)的预测和进展指标。纵向研究目前追踪了大量PD患者和处于PD前驱阶段或处于PD前驱阶段的患者。但是,对于所评估的标记的种类和所使用的评估尚无概述。方法:通过问卷调查的方式收集21项联合计划-神经退行性疾病研究BioLoC-PD工作组研究的设计,样本量,评估的标志物和评估信息。研究分为危险/前驱或临床PD队列。这些评估分为定量评估,研究者评估的评估,研究者访谈,患者评估的问卷和护理者评估的问卷。结果:这些数据的汇编显示出对评估标记的有趣共识,但是评估存在巨大差异。此外,在风险/前驱和临床PD人群中评估的标记物和评估方法存在显着相似性。结论:作为BioLoC-PD联盟的一部分的纵向队列的清单显示,对于在PD的纵向队列研究中应评估的标记物,人们已形成了越来越多的共识。但是,关于具体评估类型仍然存在争议。为了能够比较数据和进行常见分析,必须协调量表和评估结果。 (C)2015 S.Karger AG,巴塞尔

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号