In the last decades, the eagerness of laboratories to publish in journals with high impact has turned into an obsessive practice, including several vices such as authorship traffic, which means offering high amounts of money for being an author or co-author of an article in high impact or "elite" journals where there has been no contribution from the offerer (e.g., Hvistendahl 2013) or other practices like including all team members in articles in order to increase the number of articles published bythe laboratory staff. Therefore, the question arises whether these are unethical practices. For many researchers, the answer would be no; however, the practice to include the laboratory group in each article published has become very common in science,either to help students for their curriculum or simply to as a pay back to another one for being included before. A clear example is when competing for funds for research or study grants; nowadays, the competence to get funds in science has turned to bevery tortuous in all the countries with some little exceptions e.g., The US National Science Foundation (NSF) program for systematic biology called: Foundation Partnerships for Enhancing Expertise in Taxonomy (PEET)] (Rodman & Cody 2003, Rodman 2007). Besides, it is important to note that the gap existing between developed countries, those under development, and those not developed makes this competition even more complex (McDade er al 2011). The evaluation method of a project can be considered in different degrees:
展开▼
