...
首页> 外文期刊>Neonatology >A time to be born and a time to die: ethical challenges in the neonatal intensive care unit.
【24h】

A time to be born and a time to die: ethical challenges in the neonatal intensive care unit.

机译:出生时间和死亡时间:新生儿重症监护室的伦理挑战。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

To live or let die is an issue probably discussed more thoroughly in perinatal medicine than in most other fields of medicine. The ethical dimensions of periviabil-ity are huge for several reasons. First of all, the ability to survive has been steadily pushed to lower gestational ages. Second, it has been increasingly clear that many immature newborns survive with serious sequels.When in 1973 Duff and Campbell [1] for the first time described withholding and withdrawing of treatment of sick newborn babies, it included 14% of neonatal deaths. More recent studies have demonstrated that this now represents close to 90% of the deaths [2]. So what has happened during these 30-40 years? Could it be that doctors working with premature newborns have become more liberal in ending treatment and let die than before, or does this development rather reflect the development of more complex medicine due to the saving of more immature lives to a greater human cost?
机译:与其他大多数医学领域相比,围生期医学可能更彻底地讨论了生死攸关的问题。周围环境的伦理意义之所以巨大,有几个原因。首先,生存能力已被稳步推向更低的胎龄。其次,越来越明显的是,许多未成熟的新生儿都存活着严重的后遗症。1973年,Duff和Campbell [1]首次描述了对生病婴儿的治疗的中止和撤回,其中14%的新生儿死亡。最近的研究表明,这已经接近死亡人数的90%[2]。那么在这30到40年间发生了什么?是因为早产新生儿的医生在结束治疗和死亡方面变得比以前更加自由,还是由于挽救了更多不成熟的生命而付出了更高的人工费用,这种发展是否反映了更复杂药物的发展?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号