首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Medical Library Association : >Real-time, evidence-based medicine instruction: a randomized controlled trial in a neonatal intensive care unit.
【24h】

Real-time, evidence-based medicine instruction: a randomized controlled trial in a neonatal intensive care unit.

机译:实时,循证医学指导:新生儿重症监护室中的一项随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: The study assesses potential for improving residents' evidence-based medicine searching skills in MEDLINE through real-time librarian instruction. SUBJECTS: Ten residents on a rotation in a neonatal intensive care unit participated. METHODOLOGY: Residents were randomized into an instruction and a non-instruction group. Residents generated questions from rounds and searched MEDLINE for answers. Data were collected through observation, search strategy analysis, and surveys. Librarians observed searches and collected data on questions, searching skills, search problems, and the test group's instruction topics. Participants performed standardized searches before, after, and six-months after intervention and were scored using a search strategy analysis tool (1 representing highest score and 5 representing lowest score). Residents completed pre- and post-intervention surveys to measure opinions about MEDLINE and search satisfaction. RESULTS: Post-intervention, the test group formulated better questions, used limits more effectively, and reported greater confidence in using MEDLINE. The control group expressed less satisfaction with retrieval and demonstrated more errors when limiting. The test and control groups had the following average search scores respectively: 3.0 and 3.5 (pre-intervention), 3.3 and 3.4 (post-intervention), and 2.0 and 3.8 (six-month post-intervention). CONCLUSION: Data suggest that measurable learning outcomes were achieved. Residents receiving instruction improved and retained searching skills six-months after intervention.
机译:目的:该研究评估了通过实时图书馆员指导提高MEDLINE中居民循证医学搜索技能的潜力。受试者:新生儿重症监护病房轮换的十名居民参加。方法:将居民随机分为一个指令组和一个非指令组。居民从回合中产生问题,并在MEDLINE中搜索答案。通过观察,搜索策略分析和调查收集数据。馆员观察了搜索并收集了有关问题,搜索技能,搜索问题以及测试组的指导主题的数据。参与者在干预之前,之后和六个月内进行了标准化搜索,并使用搜索策略分析工具进行了评分(1位代表最高分,5位代表最低分)。居民完成了干预前后的调查,以评估有关MEDLINE和搜索满意度的意见。结果:干预后,测试组提出了更好的问题,更有效地使用了限制,并报告了使用MEDLINE的更大信心。对照组表示对检索的满意度较低,并且在限制时表现出更多错误。测试组和对照组的平均搜索得分分别为:3.0和3.5(干预前),3.3和3.4(干预后)以及2.0和3.8(干预后六个月)。结论:数据表明可测量的学习成果得以实现。接受指导的居民在干预后六个月就提高了并保留了搜索技能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号