Immunohistochemical staining for proliferation antigen as a predictor of chronic graft dysfunction and renal graft loss.

摘要

Background: Assessment of proliferation rate (PR%) using monoclonal antibody for Ki-67 antigen has recently been found to have prognostic importance in lung and cardiac allografts. We ascertained whether the same might be true for renal allografts. Methods: Newly cut sections from 20 archival paraffin blocks of renal allograft biopsy material showing acute cellular rejection and/or acute tubular necrosis (ATN) and absence of other pathology were stained using MIB-1 antibody and were further double-stained with anti-CD3, anti-CD20 or anti-CD68 antibodies. Counts of staining of mononuclear interstitial cells were correlated with clinical and pathological data. Results: Mean PR% was significantly greater than that in control renal allografts (13.23 +/- 1.94 vs. 2.84 +/- 1.66, p < 0.01). PR% of cases with ATN and no or borderline rejection was significantly lower than that of the remaining cases with acute rejection pathology (6.68 +/- 1.15 vs. 14.31 +/- 1.62, p < 0.05). However, PR% was neither correlated to histological rejection grade nor to long-term graft outcome. Double labelling failed to identify the cell type of most infiltrating MIB-1 positive cells. Conclusion: Positive MIB-1 staining helps to identify the presence of rejection but does not appear to predict prognosis or correlate with the Banff classification of rejection pathology.