首页> 外文期刊>Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology >Expert consensus document: The international scientific association for probiotics and prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic
【24h】

Expert consensus document: The international scientific association for probiotics and prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic

机译:专家共识文件:益生菌和益生元国际科学协会就益生菌一词的范围和适当使用达成共识声明

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

An expert panel was convened in October 2013 by the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) to discuss the field of probiotics. It is now 13 years since the definition of probiotics and 12 years after guidelines were published for regulators, scientists and industry by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the WHO (FAO/WHO). The FAO/WHO definition of a probiotic-"live microorganisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host "-was reinforced as relevant and sufficiently accommodating for current and anticipated applications. However, inconsistencies between the FAO/WHO Expert Consultation Report and the FAO/WHO Guidelines were clarified to take into account advances in science and applications. A more precise use of the term 'probiotic' will be useful to guide clinicians and consumers in differentiating the diverse products on the market. This document represents the conclusions of the ISAPP consensus meeting on the appropriate use and scope of the term probiotic.
机译:国际益生菌和益生元科学协会(ISAPP)于2013年10月召集了一个专家小组,讨论益生菌领域。自从定义益生菌至今已有13年,而联合国粮食及农业组织和世界卫生组织(FAO / WHO)为监管者,科学家和工业界发布了准则已有12年。粮农组织/世卫组织对益生菌“活微生物的定义”得到了适当的说明,这种活微生物当以适当的量给予宿主时具有健康益处。但是,澄清了粮农组织/世卫组织专家咨询报告与粮农组织/世卫组织准则之间的矛盾之处,以考虑到科学和应用方面的进展。术语“益生菌”的更精确用法将有助于指导临床医生和消费者区分市场上的多种产品。该文件代表了ISAPP共识会议关于益生菌一词的适当用法和范围的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号